From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 04 Sep 2007 12:33:43 +0100 (BST) Received: from elvis.franken.de ([193.175.24.41]:26287 "EHLO elvis.franken.de") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20024683AbXIDLde (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Sep 2007 12:33:34 +0100 Received: from uucp (helo=solo.franken.de) by elvis.franken.de with local-bsmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1ISWez-0004S9-00; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 13:33:33 +0200 Received: by solo.franken.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1D63211ACCE; Tue, 4 Sep 2007 13:33:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 13:33:25 +0200 To: "Kevin D. Kissell" Cc: yshi , linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] malta4kec hang in calibrate_delay fix Message-ID: <20070904113325.GA6904@alpha.franken.de> References: <46DD1CD1.5040306@windriver.com> <006901c7eeda$d8049a50$10eca8c0@grendel> <1188901951.4106.16.camel@yshi.CORP> <006f01c7eee5$bbe77c60$10eca8c0@grendel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <006f01c7eee5$bbe77c60$10eca8c0@grendel> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: tsbogend@alpha.franken.de (Thomas Bogendoerfer) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 16370 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: tsbogend@alpha.franken.de Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips > In that case, your core is a 4Kc and not a 4KEc. The "r2" value in the does that mean all 4KEc must support MIPS32R2 ? TI claims to use an 4KEc core for their AR7/UR8 SoCs, but they only support MIPS32R1. Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessary a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]