From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:31:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:6067 "EHLO dl5rb.ham-radio-op.net") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20022967AbXJ2Sbv (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:31:51 +0000 Received: from denk.linux-mips.net (denk.linux-mips.net [127.0.0.1]) by dl5rb.ham-radio-op.net (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l9TIViBj014339; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:31:44 GMT Received: (from ralf@localhost) by denk.linux-mips.net (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l9TIVRnE014338; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:31:27 GMT Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:31:27 +0000 From: Ralf Baechle To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Atsushi Nemoto , linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] store sign-extend register values for PTRACE_GETREGS Message-ID: <20071029183127.GA14270@linux-mips.org> References: <20070304.024152.96687132.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <20071026.005302.25909293.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <20071028193421.GC7661@linux-mips.org> <20071028195211.GA29200@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071028195211.GA29200@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 17295 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 03:52:11PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 07:34:21PM +0000, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 12:53:02AM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > > > > Daniel, do you see any debugger compatibility issues with this patch? > > I don't think so; I'm pretty sure I wrote the code at fault here, > and I can't remember any reason I would have deliberately made the > registers unsigned. Looking at the fix I think I just guessed > wrong about the type used by __put_user. Good. So I just applied it. Ralf