Re: [PATCH] Introduce __fill_user() and kill __bzero()

[Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>]

Franck Bui-Huu wrote:
> Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Franck Bui-Huu wrote:
> >>  /*
> >> - * memset(void *s, int c, size_t n)
> >> + * An outline version of memset, which should be used either by gcc or
> >> + * by assembly code.
> >> + */
> >> +NESTED(memset, 24, ra)
> >> +	PTR_ADDU	sp, sp, -24
> >> +	LONG_S		a0, 16(sp)
> >> +	LONG_S		ra, 20(sp)
> >> +	jal		__fill_user
> >> +	LONG_L		v0, 16(sp)
> >> +	LONG_L		ra, 20(sp)
> >> +	PTR_ADDU	sp, sp, 24
> >> +	jr		ra
> >> +END(memset)
> > 
> > This will break on 64bit kernels.
> > 
> 
> Is the following correct ?
> 
> NESTED(memset, 16, ra)
>         PTR_ADDU        sp, sp, -16
>         LONG_S          a0,  8(sp)
>         LONG_S          ra, 16(sp)
>         jal             __fill_user
>         LONG_L          v0,  8(sp)
>         LONG_L          ra, 16(sp)
>         PTR_ADDU        sp, sp, 16
>         jr              ra
> END(memset)
> 
> I know it doesn't respect any mips ABI but in this case do
> we really care ?

In general we do (think of stack unwinding etc.).  I believe this
implementation should move to C, as it doesn't need an assembler
implementation:

void *memset (void *s, int c, kernel_size_t n)
{
	__fill_user(s, c, n);
	return s;
}

It looks much nicer that way. :-)


Thiemo