From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 22 Nov 2007 16:19:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:21708 "EHLO dl5rb.ham-radio-op.net") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20025862AbXKVQT4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Nov 2007 16:19:56 +0000 Received: from denk.linux-mips.net (denk.linux-mips.net [127.0.0.1]) by dl5rb.ham-radio-op.net (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lAMGJaVA006647; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 16:19:36 GMT Received: (from ralf@localhost) by denk.linux-mips.net (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id lAMGJZki006646; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 16:19:35 GMT Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 16:19:35 +0000 From: Ralf Baechle To: Atsushi Nemoto Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [MIPS] irq_cpu: use handle_percpu_irq handler to avoid dropping interrupts. Message-ID: <20071122161935.GA6605@linux-mips.org> References: <20071123.004132.61510296.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071123.004132.61510296.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 17562 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 12:41:32AM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > This might broke probe_irq_on()/probe_irq_off(), since > handle_percpu_irq() does not check IRQ_WAITING bit. Ok - but does that matter at all? IRQ probing is only used with ISA drivers and for those there will be another interrupt controller such as a i8259 PIC daisy chained to one of the CPU interrupt pins. Ralf