From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:18:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from static-ip-62-75-166-246.inaddr.intergenia.de ([62.75.166.246]:35270 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20038971AbXKZORw (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:17:52 +0000 Received: from t0b61.t.pppool.de ([89.55.11.97] helo=powermac.local) by vs166246.vserver.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Iwela-00036c-1t; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:16:54 +0000 From: Michael Buesch To: Steve Brown Subject: Re: ohci-ssb driver on a Broadcom BCM5354 Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 15:15:42 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: "John W. Linville" , linux-mips@linux-mips.org References: <47408305.5090804@cortland.com> <200711191923.56471.mb@bu3sch.de> <474AA87D.7000509@cortland.com> In-Reply-To: <474AA87D.7000509@cortland.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200711261515.42501.mb@bu3sch.de> Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 17587 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: mb@bu3sch.de Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Monday 26 November 2007 12:05:33 Steve Brown wrote: > Michael Buesch wrote: > > On Sunday 18 November 2007 23:47:52 John W. Linville wrote: > > > >> You probably want to make Michael Buesch aware of this issue. > >> > > > > I'm not sure anyone really tested this beyond some insmod tests. > > I did not test this, as I don't have such a device. > > So if you have any patches to fix this, please send them. I'm > > certainly the wrong person who can fix this. ;) > > > > > Adding the following at the end of ssb_ohci_attach seems to fix the problem. > > if (ssb_dma_set_mask(dev, DMA_32BIT_MASK)) > return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > I guessed at the dma mask. Would the code in the b43 driver that selects > a dma mask be appropriate here? I have no idea. If it makes it work, yeah. Cool. Let's add this. -- Greetings Michael.