From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:24:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:2454 "EHLO dl5rb.ham-radio-op.net") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S28574355AbXLLLYX (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:24:23 +0000 Received: from denk.linux-mips.net (denk.linux-mips.net [127.0.0.1]) by dl5rb.ham-radio-op.net (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lBCBNj62029796; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:23:45 GMT Received: (from ralf@localhost) by denk.linux-mips.net (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id lBCBNhOi029795; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:23:43 GMT Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:23:43 +0000 From: Ralf Baechle To: Yoichi Yuasa Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: Cobalt fixes Message-ID: <20071212112343.GA28868@linux-mips.org> References: <20071211121220.GA10870@linux-mips.org> <20071211235001.8621bdb9.yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp> <20071211153522.GB15843@linux-mips.org> <20071212075309.5172da92.yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071212075309.5172da92.yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 17784 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 07:53:09AM +0900, Yoichi Yuasa wrote: > > > > for non-subscribers. Linus has reverted the offending patch > > > > fd6e732186ab522c812ab19c2c5e5befb8ec8115 in question so now the PCI and > > > > I/O port code needs to be fixed up to be able to handle such a setup. > > > > > > It can be fixed my fix PCI resource patch. > > > > > > http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2007-01/msg00049.html > > > > Modulo a codying style issue that one is the same as the pci.c segment of > > the patch I've just posted. > > This is a fix proposed before fd6e732186ab522c812ab19c2c5e5befb8ec8115. > This patch is still effective. Ah, I had already applied the identical patch yesterday. Thanks anyway! But it should be considered temporary. For some configurations there is no chance for this to work and the patch will probably get in my way for the planned rewrite of the resource allocation. Ralf