From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:56:03 +0100 (BST) Received: from vigor.karmaclothing.net ([217.169.26.28]:29649 "EHLO vigor.karmaclothing.net") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20035254AbYFMN4A (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:56:00 +0100 Received: from denk.linux-mips.net (denk.linux-mips.net [127.0.0.1]) by vigor.karmaclothing.net (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m5DDtdBO016654; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:55:40 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by denk.linux-mips.net (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id m5DDtcF2016641; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:55:38 +0100 Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:55:38 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: Atsushi Nemoto Cc: adrian.bunk@movial.fi, chris@mips.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: mips: CONF_CM_DEFAULT build error Message-ID: <20080613135538.GF703@linux-mips.org> References: <20080525170718.GD1791@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <20080602.012814.35471915.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080602.012814.35471915.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 19535 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 01:28:14AM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > > Commit 351336929ccf222ae38ff0cb7a8dd5fd5c6236a0 > > ([MIPS] Allow setting of the cache attribute at run time.) > > causes the following build error with pnx8550-jbs_defconfig > > and pnx8550-stb810_defconfig: > > I wondered why the commit has my S-O-B, and finally found that I had > fixed a section mismatch caused by the original patch (on queue tree > on linux-mips.org) and Ralf had folded my fix into the original patch, > with my S-O-B. Folding on the queue tree will be good on many case, > but sometimes a bit confusing. :-) Yes, I try to merge any follow on patches into the original patch as long as that one is still sitting in the patch queue. Since that result in bugs getting fixes before they ever show up in any of the more static trees, that is the MIPS or kernel.org git trees there is little point in documenting bugs "that never existed" and their "non-fixes" ;-) Ralf