From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:23:59 +0100 (BST) Received: from vigor.karmaclothing.net ([217.169.26.28]:2266 "EHLO vigor.karmaclothing.net") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20044285AbYFPJX4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:23:56 +0100 Received: from denk.linux-mips.net (denk.linux-mips.net [127.0.0.1]) by vigor.karmaclothing.net (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m5G9NZkL006421; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:23:36 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by denk.linux-mips.net (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id m5G9NYxQ006408; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:23:34 +0100 Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:23:33 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: Daniel Laird Cc: Florian Fainelli , linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] : Add support for =?utf-8?Q?NX?= =?utf-8?Q?P_PNX833x_=28STB222=2F5=29_into_linux_kernel=E2=80=8F?= (UPDATE) Message-ID: <20080616092333.GA10004@linux-mips.org> References: <64660ef00806160138i7a5ba93cu926d112625ee401d@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <64660ef00806160138i7a5ba93cu926d112625ee401d@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 19562 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 09:38:42AM +0100, Daniel Laird wrote: > Once again comments appreciated, however there does not seem to be a > conclusion to changes I should make to my (Updated) patch. > > Does this means the patch is acceptable as it stands? Or is further > rework required? On of the things I was wondering is if it makes sense to apply your patch without having applied the "Vectored Interrupts and timers for MIPS 4KC" first? Ralf