From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 02 Jul 2008 11:52:10 +0100 (BST) Received: from relay01.mx.bawue.net ([193.7.176.67]:43964 "EHLO relay01.mx.bawue.net") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S62068190AbYGBKwB (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jul 2008 11:52:01 +0100 Received: from lagash (88-106-136-149.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com [88.106.136.149]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay01.mx.bawue.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5108548918; Wed, 2 Jul 2008 12:51:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ths by lagash with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KDzwJ-0002F6-Er; Wed, 02 Jul 2008 11:51:55 +0100 Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 11:51:55 +0100 From: Thiemo Seufer To: Atsushi Nemoto Cc: mlarsen@broadcom.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: Bug in atomic_sub_if_positive Message-ID: <20080702105155.GC7007@networkno.de> References: <20080702095955.GA7007@networkno.de> <20080702.193133.211490377.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080702.193133.211490377.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 19693 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ths@networkno.de Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 10:59:56 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > > --- a/include/asm-mips/atomic.h 2008-06-25 22:38:43.159739000 -0700 > > > +++ b/include/asm-mips/atomic.h 2008-06-25 22:39:07.552065000 -0700 > > > @@ -292,10 +292,10 @@ static __inline__ int atomic_sub_if_posi > > > " beqz %0, 2f \n" > > > " subu %0, %1, %3 \n" > > > " .set reorder \n" > > > - "1: \n" > > > " .subsection 2 \n" > > > "2: b 1b \n" > > > " .previous \n" > > > + "1: \n" > > > > AFAICS this change should make no difference to the generated code. I > > suspect you assembler handles .subsection incorrectly. Can you provide > > a disassembled exapmle which gets altered by this patch? Also, please > > tell us the exact version of the assembler you use. > > Why no defference? The '1b' in subsection refer backword '1' label on > the source code (which is a label for LL insn in this case with the > patch) ? Oh. Now that you spelled it out I see it, too. :-) > Anyway I can provide them. I'm using vanilla 2.17 and 2.18. > > Without the patch: > 801233bc : > 801233bc: lui v0,0x8038 > 801233c0: ll a0,31976(v0) > 801233c4: addiu v1,a0,-1 > 801233c8: bltz v1,801233dc > 801233cc: nop > 801233d0: sc v1,31976(v0) > 801233d4: beqz v1,80124dac > 801233d8: addiu v1,a0,-1 > 801233dc: bltz v1,801233fc > 801233e0: li v0,-1 > ... > 80124dac: b 801233dc > 80124db0: nop > > With the patch: > 801233bc : > 801233bc: lui v0,0x8038 > 801233c0: ll a0,31976(v0) > 801233c4: addiu v1,a0,-1 > 801233c8: bltz v1,801233dc > 801233cc: nop > 801233d0: sc v1,31976(v0) > 801233d4: beqz v1,80124dac > 801233d8: addiu v1,a0,-1 > 801233dc: bltz v1,801233fc > 801233e0: li v0,-1 > ... > 80124dac: b 801233c0 > 80124db0: nop > > > The patch looks correct. Agreed. Thiemo