From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:43:14 +0100 (BST) Received: from ditditdahdahdah-dahdahdahditdit.dl5rb.org.uk ([217.169.26.28]:58549 "EHLO ditditdahdahdah-dahdahdahditdit.dl5rb.org.uk") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S28581349AbYGPInM (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:43:12 +0100 Received: from denk.linux-mips.net (denk.linux-mips.net [127.0.0.1]) by ditditdahdahdah-dahdahdahditdit.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m6G8hAc7023108; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:43:11 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by denk.linux-mips.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m6G8hAab023107; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:43:10 +0100 Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:43:10 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: Dmitri Vorobiev Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 part 2] [MIPS] make the pcibios_max_latency variable static Message-ID: <20080716084310.GA22957@linux-mips.org> References: <1216141052-28005-2-git-send-email-dmitri.vorobiev@movial.fi> <1216195309-13069-1-git-send-email-dmitri.vorobiev@movial.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1216195309-13069-1-git-send-email-dmitri.vorobiev@movial.fi> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 19844 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:01:49AM +0300, Dmitri Vorobiev wrote: > Along with making the pcibios_max_latency variable static, > its declaration needs to be removed from the header file. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitri Vorobiev > --- > > Hi Ralf, > > Forgot about this one yesterday, sorry. No big deal, lmo's internet connection was down for part of the afternoon so I wasn't doing as much patch stuff as I was hoping to ... I folded part 2 into part 1 of your patch and applied the result. Thanks, Ralf