From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:28:01 +0100 (BST) Received: from h4.dl5rb.org.uk ([81.2.74.4]:18312 "EHLO ditditdahdahdah-dahdahdahditdit.dl5rb.org.uk") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S22362499AbYJYO1w (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:27:52 +0100 Received: from denk.linux-mips.net (denk.linux-mips.net [127.0.0.1]) by ditditdahdahdah-dahdahdahditdit.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m9PERp3w004049; Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:27:51 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by denk.linux-mips.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m9PERiKH004047; Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:27:44 +0100 Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:27:44 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: Dmitri Vorobiev Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [MIPS] IP22: Small cleanups Message-ID: <20081025142740.GB1827@linux-mips.org> References: <1224888417-26494-1-git-send-email-dmitri.vorobiev@movial.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1224888417-26494-1-git-send-email-dmitri.vorobiev@movial.fi> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 20967 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 01:46:56AM +0300, Dmitri Vorobiev wrote: > diff --git a/arch/mips/sgi-ip22/ip22-int.c b/arch/mips/sgi-ip22/ip22-int.c > index f6d9bf4..5b9b4f3 100644 > --- a/arch/mips/sgi-ip22/ip22-int.c > +++ b/arch/mips/sgi-ip22/ip22-int.c > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > > #include > #include > @@ -23,7 +24,6 @@ > #include > #include > #include > -#include does not include . This sort of stuff happens if you believe checkpatch.pl. You only got away because the header isn't needed anyway. I'll apply the patch with this bit dropped. Ralf PS: Suspicion breeds confidence. At least in case of checkpatch ;-)