From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:22:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from h4.dl5rb.org.uk ([81.2.74.4]:58004 "EHLO ditditdahdahdah-dahdahdahditdit.dl5rb.org.uk") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S22594491AbYJ1QWA (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:22:00 +0000 Received: from denk.linux-mips.net (denk.linux-mips.net [127.0.0.1]) by ditditdahdahdah-dahdahdahditdit.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m9SGLq77000810; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:21:52 GMT Received: (from ralf@localhost) by denk.linux-mips.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m9SGLqJi000808; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:21:52 GMT Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:21:52 +0000 From: Ralf Baechle To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: David Daney , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Tomaso Paoletti Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/36] MIPSR2 ebase isn't just CAC_BASE Message-ID: <20081028162152.GB349@linux-mips.org> References: <1225152181-3221-4-git-send-email-ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> <1225152181-3221-5-git-send-email-ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> <1225152181-3221-6-git-send-email-ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> <1225152181-3221-7-git-send-email-ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> <1225152181-3221-8-git-send-email-ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> <1225152181-3221-9-git-send-email-ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> <1225152181-3221-10-git-send-email-ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> <1225152181-3221-11-git-send-email-ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> <20081028095655.GB18610@linux-mips.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 21062 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 04:05:34PM +0000, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > Another thing I noticed is that we don't use write_c0_ebase(), so the > > firmware better setup this correctly or we crash and burn. We better > > should initialize that right ... > > Well, your version still does not do it... Intentional omission. We didn't do that before and Cavium didn't seem to need it so we can put off fixing that for a little longer. It needs a little thought to get NUMA right ... Ralf