From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:36:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:52679 "EHLO h5.dl5rb.org.uk") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S21367813AbZCWPgM (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:36:12 +0000 Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2NFa8Qi027351; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:36:10 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n2NFa6Vp027294; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:36:06 +0100 Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:36:05 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: Shinya Kuribayashi Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Mark Eins: Fix cascading interrupt dispatcher Message-ID: <20090323153605.GA26942@linux-mips.org> References: <49C4E5D5.4070408@ruby.dti.ne.jp> <20090323135239.GA21286@linux-mips.org> <49C7A497.3020801@ruby.dti.ne.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49C7A497.3020801@ruby.dti.ne.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 22130 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:02:47AM +0900, Shinya Kuribayashi wrote: > Ralf Baechle wrote: >> Looks ok - but this patch series conflicts with your earlier patch >> >> http://www.linux-mips.org/git?p=linux-queue.git;a=commit;h=45d0f39ad6ecc84fa5a3ca301497842ea68bd633 >> >> Let me know what to do. Thanks. > > If possible, please drop the commit above, then apply new four patches. > Or, apply three patches except for "MIPS: EMMA2RH: Use handle_edge_irq() > handler". I hope they don't conflict with the commit above. Okay, done. >> * Prevent cascading interrupt from bits being processed afterward > > I would like to say `prevent A from B', of course... Fixed. Ralf