From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Don't write ones to reserved entryhi bits.
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 17:29:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090527162937.GA9831@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1241812330-21041-1-git-send-email-ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 12:52:10PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> According to the MIPS64 Privileged Resource Architecture manual, only
> values of zero may be written to bits 8..10 of CP0 entryhi. We need
> to add masking by ASID_MASK.
Yes, I've silently been relying on the hardware chopping off the excess
bits for no better reason that it saving an instruction. One of the
functions you've touched is switch_mm() which is being used in context
switches and any changes to it will show up in context switching
benchmarks.
The patch you did (and along with that some older SMTC changes by Kevin)
can be done slightly more elegant because we already have:
#define cpu_asid(cpu, mm) (cpu_context((cpu), (mm)) & ASID_MASK)
in <asm/mmu_context.h>.
We used to optimize the ASID managment code by code patching even, see
mmu_context.h in 78c388aed2b7184182c08428db1de6c872d815f5.
Ralf
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
arch/mips/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 10 +++++-----
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/mmu_context.h
index d7f3eb0..25a50fa 100644
--- a/arch/mips/include/asm/mmu_context.h
+++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/mmu_context.h
@@ -164,12 +164,12 @@ static inline void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
* having ASID_MASK smaller than the hardware maximum,
* make sure no "soft" bits become "hard"...
*/
- write_c0_entryhi((read_c0_entryhi() & ~HW_ASID_MASK)
- | (cpu_context(cpu, next) & ASID_MASK));
+ write_c0_entryhi((read_c0_entryhi() & ~HW_ASID_MASK) |
+ cpu_asid(cpu, next));
ehb(); /* Make sure it propagates to TCStatus */
evpe(mtflags);
#else
- write_c0_entryhi(cpu_context(cpu, next));
+ write_c0_entryhi(cpu_asid(cpu, next));
#endif /* CONFIG_MIPS_MT_SMTC */
TLBMISS_HANDLER_SETUP_PGD(next->pgd);
@@ -225,11 +225,11 @@ activate_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next)
}
/* See comments for similar code above */
write_c0_entryhi((read_c0_entryhi() & ~HW_ASID_MASK) |
- (cpu_context(cpu, next) & ASID_MASK));
+ cpu_asid(cpu, next));
ehb(); /* Make sure it propagates to TCStatus */
evpe(mtflags);
#else
- write_c0_entryhi(cpu_context(cpu, next));
+ write_c0_entryhi(cpu_asid(cpu, next));
#endif /* CONFIG_MIPS_MT_SMTC */
TLBMISS_HANDLER_SETUP_PGD(next->pgd);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-27 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-08 19:52 [PATCH] MIPS: Don't write ones to reserved entryhi bits David Daney
2009-05-27 16:29 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2009-09-16 18:09 ` David Daney
2009-10-02 20:34 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090527162937.GA9831@linux-mips.org \
--to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).