From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:20:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:51622 "EHLO h5.dl5rb.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S1492972AbZI1NUI (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:20:08 +0200 Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8SDLRXe027147; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:21:27 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8SDLMDD027129; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:21:22 +0100 Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:21:22 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: Maxime Bizon Cc: Sergei Shtylyov , Wolfram Sang , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] MIPS: BCM63xx: Add PCMCIA & Cardbus support. Message-ID: <20090928132122.GA26272@linux-mips.org> References: <1253272891.1627.284.camel@sakura.staff.proxad.net> <20090923123143.GB3131@pengutronix.de> <1253709915.1627.397.camel@sakura.staff.proxad.net> <1253890476.1627.468.camel@sakura.staff.proxad.net> <4ABCF1E7.4010304@ru.mvista.com> <1254142183.1627.488.camel@sakura.staff.proxad.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1254142183.1627.488.camel@sakura.staff.proxad.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 24109 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 02:49:43PM +0200, Maxime Bizon wrote: > > a good idea. I'd put the driver in its own separate patch... > > Ralf seems ok with merging as-is, next time I'll split board support and > driver I guess. The patch headers patches which are required by the arch and the driver bits. To avoid patch ordering issues that could result from splitting and then most likely submitting the resulting patches via multiple maintainers it was the easiest to just submit everything in a single patch. Ralf