From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:36:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.78.145]:16868 "EHLO ey-out-1920.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S1492479AbZKILgs (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:36:48 +0100 Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 4so117456eyg.52 for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 03:36:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=VYKYmXNBA3y19ntzeFa0sjdAonwVh69pgf7ICAU0HaM=; b=HdvZbsJTy4EsMAMyQ04Jqxpi0jbihDlqwvqXtvwSxxOayzRcDpie8ovYsliXKg9d8h TJzGufweiU3pBa21H5F7tQOGOJUHvI+KvGvDi9FTDm0OyzJRd6zFTFMxC3mwDV7cXBPi bvX6i2NL2Y/hrzgE4ZL4NPAyJ8bND9vu0lDO0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=sDUJtzhK4VnQ6UO3hRWq7V14CclNuV1bU+0IbJW9BzjlXYfQycX2qEnnKstzLL61OA Nuj2rlzYnNnbmoHdQxXpccKG9ErYU9oEQpMUaN/E0ev34nxbZerzReQAiEfWiEP9pAav +0sCs1LemkuCaBHvt3i5fYUZiL8w2yTGCLauw= Received: by 10.213.2.71 with SMTP id 7mr4059235ebi.68.1257766607946; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 03:36:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from nowhere (ADijon-552-1-106-222.w90-33.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.33.185.222]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm6123057eyf.15.2009.11.09.03.36.44 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 09 Nov 2009 03:36:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by nowhere (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1000 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) fweisbec@gmail.com; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:36:52 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:36:50 +0100 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Wu Zhangjin Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ralf Baechle , Richard Sandiford , Nicholas Mc Guire , David Daney , Adam Nemet , Patrik Kluba Subject: Re: [PATCH -v6 08/13] tracing: add IRQENTRY_EXIT section for MIPS Message-ID: <20091109113647.GA5206@nowhere> References: <20091109022640.GC13153@nowhere> <1257737468.3451.9.camel@falcon.domain.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1257737468.3451.9.camel@falcon.domain.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 24765 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: fweisbec@gmail.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 11:31:08AM +0800, Wu Zhangjin wrote: > Who should I resend this patchset to? you or Steven? If this patchset > are okay, I will rebase it on the latest tracing/core branch of -tip and > send the latest version out, and hope you can apply it, otherwise, I > need to rebase it to the future mainline versions again and again ;) and > at least, I have tested all of them and their combinations on YeeLoong > netbook, they work well. of course, more testing report from the other > MIPS developers are welcome ;) > > Regards, > Wu Zhangjin You can keep the current Cc list so that we are all uptodate with the latest state. I don't think you need to rebase against latest tracing/core as there doesn't seem to be conflicatble changes inside added lately. The person who is likely to apply it is Steven as he can test it :) Thanks.