From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:16:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:54568 "EHLO h5.dl5rb.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S1493307AbZKLVQs (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:16:48 +0100 Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nACLGhLh027976; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:16:44 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nACLGbSH027974; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:16:37 +0100 Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:16:37 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: Wu Zhangjin , David Daney , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zhangfx@lemote.com, zhouqg@gmail.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar , Nicholas Mc Guire , Richard Sandiford , Patrik Kluba , Thomas Gleixner , Michal Simek Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 04/17] tracing: add static function tracer support for MIPS Message-ID: <20091112211637.GA27465@linux-mips.org> References: <9dc81a7a9e5a292cccdf465c533a2b08d19d6021.1257779502.git.wuzhangjin@gmail.com> <8f579e2cece16cd22358a4ec143ef6a8c462639b.1257779502.git.wuzhangjin@gmail.com> <4AF8B31C.5030802@caviumnetworks.com> <1257814817.2822.3.camel@falcon.domain.org> <4AF99848.9090000@caviumnetworks.com> <1257907351.2922.37.camel@falcon.domain.org> <20091111031325.GA20716@linux-mips.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 24884 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 01:30:40PM +0000, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Nov 2009, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > > 64-bit with -mlong-call: > > > > lui $25, %highest(foo) > > lui $2, %hi(foo) > > daddiu $25, %higher(foo) > > daddiu $2, %lo(foo) > > dsll $25, 32 > > daddu $25, $2 > > jalr $25 > > Don't we use -msym32 these days for this very reason? We do - where we can. Not all systems can use -msym32. Ralf