From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:16:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ew0-f212.google.com ([209.85.219.212]:60441 "EHLO mail-ew0-f212.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S1492418AbZLBKQc (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:16:32 +0100 Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so40969ewy.27 for ; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 02:16:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:from:organization:to :subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=GDhhUFKbqkFHMdOOjUO9tS7mpIKErGDBxzCpKvRAKRQ=; b=noC7DjrnAD1A5byE7JmuM8RGzoGGSd6sqrBDivV4n0R1Zn4r9N/8rLWwR+5Q9akYT5 vACnE0USrq6hEzVnMeTFaFMrHGkFErJmTjguczUQpmmKih1pBk+C4V0jFTrDpP+kcc1p PJcj/mMENh7Hlky0dBmaKiDby35wMWUziT7+k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :message-id; b=JlMAJAxgeK4NZ5cC+kbaJsk+I5zSlcaB/q5Hnin8OHM529P2Ll1RHbqx2WblQIPi3i JWP3keSYc/1EHI19R4+N5+sKlix+7De7opMei6d0c3jyv32QPwjIBwRwlBBGBCnCJVMk C0BOPJE9ydfd6bthAbz5nM3eIzdcGW6BGlO88= Received: by 10.213.107.16 with SMTP id z16mr7484580ebo.47.1259748987090; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 02:16:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from flexo.localnet (bobafett.staff.proxad.net [213.228.1.121]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 13sm639574ewy.1.2009.12.02.02.16.25 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 02 Dec 2009 02:16:26 -0800 (PST) From: Florian Fainelli Organization: OpenWrt To: Hector Martin Subject: Re: BCM63xx merge progress Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:16:01 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31-15-server; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: mbizon@freebox.fr, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org References: <4B15974E.1060505@marcansoft.com> <1259719052.2452.26.camel@kero> <4B15D4E7.6060707@marcansoft.com> In-Reply-To: <4B15D4E7.6060707@marcansoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200912021116.01290.florian@openwrt.org> Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 25265 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: florian@openwrt.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Wednesday 02 December 2009 03:45:59 Hector Martin wrote: > Maxime Bizon wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 01:25 +0100, Hector Martin wrote: > >> Well, there's a commit (4059ddb4) that claims to "Add USB OHCI support", > >> yet it only adds a #include to ohci-hcd.c and a few .h bits. The actual > >> ohci-bcm63xx.c is missing, which means the OHCI driver probably won't > >> even compile. It's also missing the relevant platform device stuff in > > > > I cannot find this commit in linus' tree nor linux-mips master, where > > does it come from ? > > Okay, nevermind, that was a screwup by me. At some point one of my > OpenWRT patch test commits made its way onto the wrong local branch, and > I didn't notice where it lived. Oops. (This commit was meant to be > incomplete, it comes straight from the OpenWRT patch). I think I found > the mips-bcm63xx (proper) patch, tried to search for it on my local > repo, and this thing popped up and I didn't look at it closely enough. > This is what I get for trying to work at 4am. > > I take back the 'broken' then, we're just left with 'incomplete'. Makes > quite a bit more sense now, sorry for the confusion. > > > The remaining two patches that were not merged in 2.6.32 are on top of > > this tree: http://www.linux-mips.org/git?p=linux-bcm63xx.git > > > > They should apply with little difficulty on current upstream kernel and > > besides the *_be stuffs that need to be cleaned up, they were ACKed by > > the usb maintainer. > > Cool, I'll see about applying them and working off of that. Thanks for > the confirmation. > > FWIW, I'm trying to reverse engineer Broadcom's DSL driver, which I hope > will be useful so we can finally have a properly working OpenWRT > firmware for DSL routers based on this firmware. Good luck :) -- WBR, Florian