From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 20 Apr 2010 02:28:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk ([81.2.74.5]:35313 "EHLO h5.dl5rb.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S1492656Ab0DTA2i (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Apr 2010 02:28:38 +0200 Received: from h5.dl5rb.org.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o3K0SZ0k032478; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 01:28:35 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by h5.dl5rb.org.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o3K0SZ0l032469; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 01:28:35 +0100 Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 01:28:35 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: wu zhangjin , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace porting of linux-2.6.29 for mips Message-ID: <20100420002835.GH18697@linux-mips.org> References: <20090403113315.GC6629@adriano.hkcable.com.hk> <20090403141158.GA27751@adriano.hkcable.com.hk> <20100419214057.GG18697@linux-mips.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100419214057.GG18697@linux-mips.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 26436 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:40:57PM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > BTW, it seems linux-mips@vger.kernel.org is not an alias of > > linux-mips@linux-mips.org, since I haven't seen our previous emails appear in > > linux-mips ML's archive. So I have added linux-mips@linux-mips.org to CC list. > > No, as far as I can say that list is dead. It's years that the list last > came to my attention and actually I thought it had been deleted as duplicate > lists for essentially the same purpose are causing confusing and postings > going down the drain unnoticed. > > Any of you subscribed there, is there activity? According to the postmaster of vger there is primarily spam on the list and he agreed to remove the list. So this posting cc'ed to it should hopefully bounce or at least be the laster one :-) Ralf