Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Philby John <pjohn@mvista.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
	David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: Fix bug using smp_processor_id() in preemptible ubi_bgt1d kthread
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:04:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100614150425.GC9550@shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1276513457.16642.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>

Philby John wrote:
> mtd: Fix bug using smp_processor_id() in preemptible ubi_bgt1d kthread
> 
> On a MIPS Cavium Octeon CN5020 when trying to create a UBI volume,
> on the NOR flash, the kernel thread ubi_bgt1d calls
> cfi_amdstd_write_buffers() --> do_write_buffer() -->
> INVALIDATE_CACHE_UDELAY --> __udelay(). Its __udelay() that calls
> smp_processor_id() in preemptible code, which you are not supposed to.
> Fix the problem by disabling preemption.

The MTD code just calls udelay().
Are you sure it isn't permitted to call udelay() from preemptible code?
I think it is fine.

Perhaps MIPS udelay() should be disabling preemption itself, or
(as x86 does) using raw_smp_processor_id() instead?  Or perhaps the x86
version is a bug because the current CPU might change during the delay loop?

See git commit 5c1ea08215f1f830dfaf4819a5f22efca41c3832
"x86: enable preemption in delay"

I don't think it makes sense to disable preemption in all udelay()
calls in drivers, so my NAK to this MTD patch.  To workaround,
consider putting the preempt_disable in MIPS udelay(), or using
raw_smp_processor_id() in it, after reading the above git commit's
message.  A proper fix would accept a context switch during the delay
and rescale the remaining count, but even on x86 they haven't done
that yet :-)

Regards,
-- Jamie

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-14 15:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-14 11:04 [PATCH] mtd: Fix bug using smp_processor_id() in preemptible ubi_bgt1d kthread Philby John
2010-06-14 15:04 ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2010-06-14 15:37   ` Philby John
2010-06-14 16:40   ` Philby John
2010-06-15 12:26   ` Philby John

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100614150425.GC9550@shareable.org \
    --to=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=pjohn@mvista.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox