From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: Anoop P <anoop.pa@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, dvomlehn@cisco.com,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Allow setup_irq call for VPE1 timer.
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 11:24:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101201112410.GL2916@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1290697632-6139-1-git-send-email-anoop.pa@gmail.com>
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 08:37:12PM +0530, Anoop P wrote:
> From: Anoop P A <anoop.pa@gmail.com>
>
> VSMP configuration can have seperate timer interrupts for each VPE.Need to setup IRQ for VPE1 timer.
> +#ifndef CONFIG_MIPS_MT_SMP
> if (cp0_timer_irq_installed)
> return 0;
> -
> +#endif
> cp0_timer_irq_installed = 1;
>
> setup_irq(irq, &c0_compare_irqaction);
On the stylistic side adding an #ifdef gives me wrinkles.
With CONFIG_MIPS_MT_SMP this patch results in sharing c0_compare_irqaction
between multiple interrupts which is broken. Struct irqaction contains
the interrupt number, all registered irqaction structs are part of a chained
list via its ->next member and also there is a per interrupt proc directory.
To fix this properly you'll have to introduce do a bit of bookkeeping - you
want to register each interrupt only once - and allocate a struct irqaction
per registered timer interrupt.
The allocation is made a little trickier by kmalloc not being available
yet by the time this code is getting invoked via time_init() so you'll
have to move it to run via the late_time_init hook like x86:
static __init void x86_late_time_init(void)
{
... do the real work ...
}
/* ... */
void __init time_init(void)
{
late_time_init = x86_late_time_init;
}
Which makes me wonder if there is a reason why we need to have both
time_init() and late_time_init() - can't we just move the time_init()?
Ralf
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-01 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-25 15:07 [PATCH 3/3] Allow setup_irq call for VPE1 timer Anoop P
2010-12-01 11:24 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101201112410.GL2916@linux-mips.org \
--to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=anoop.pa@gmail.com \
--cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dvomlehn@cisco.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox