From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:21:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:41129 "EHLO duck.linux-mips.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S1491166Ab1C3OVW (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:21:22 +0200 Received: from duck.linux-mips.net (duck.linux-mips.net [127.0.0.1]) by duck.linux-mips.net (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p2UELHGQ025044; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:21:17 +0200 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by duck.linux-mips.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p2UELED7025041; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:21:14 +0200 Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:21:14 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Catalin Marinas Cc: Maxin John , Daniel Baluta , naveen yadav , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: kmemleak for MIPS Message-ID: <20110330142114.GA17899@linux-mips.org> References: <9bde694e1003020554p7c8ff3c2o4ae7cb5d501d1ab9@mail.gmail.com> <1300960540.32158.13.camel@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <1301395206.583.53.camel@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1301395206.583.53.camel@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 29651 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:40:06AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: I applied this patch separately as it makes sense just by itself. Thanks, Ralf