Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Close races in TLB modify handlers.
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 09:27:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110701082706.GA8308@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E0D0D8C.7000200@cavium.com>

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 04:58:04PM -0700, David Daney wrote:

> On 06/30/2011 04:34 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> >Hi David,
> >
> >>Page table entries are made invalid by writing a zero into the the PTE
> >>slot in a page table.  This creates a race condition with the TLB
> >>modify handlers when they are updating the PTE.
> >>
> >>CPU0                              CPU1
> >>
> >>Test for _PAGE_PRESENT
> >>.                                 set to not _PAGE_PRESENT (zero)
> >>Set to _PAGE_VALID
> >>
> >>So now the page not present value (zero) is suddenly valid and user
> >>space programs have access to physical page zero.
> >>
> >>We close the race by putting the test for _PAGE_PRESENT and setting of
> >>_PAGE_VALID into an atomic LL/SC section.  This requires more
> >>registers than just K0 and K1 in the handlers, so we need to save some
> >>registers to a save area and then restore them when we are done.
> >
> >  Hmm, good catch, but doesn't your change pessimise the UP case?
> 
> It may, It is really just a first version of the patch.  I am
> looking for feedback and testing.
> 
> >It looks
> >to me like you save&  restore the scratch registers even though the race
> >does not apply to UP (you can't interrupt a TLB handler, not at this
> >stage).
> 
> That's right.  I will look at trying to generate the old code
> sequences for non-SMP.

We can replace all the CONFIG_SMPs in tlbex.c (existing and those added
by your patch) with num_possible_cpus > 1 which will improve readability
and give SMP kernels running on a single processor the uniprocessor TLB
exception handler.

But that's something for a followup patch; your patch is big enough as it
is, it's not as straight forward as it may sound and the 3.0 clock is
ticking ...

  Ralf

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-01  8:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-30 22:31 [PATCH] MIPS: Close races in TLB modify handlers David Daney
2011-06-30 23:34 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2011-06-30 23:58   ` David Daney
2011-07-01  8:27     ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2011-07-01 16:38       ` David Daney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110701082706.GA8308@linux-mips.org \
    --to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox