From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: "Langer Thomas (LQDE CPE AE SW)" <thomas.langer@lantiq.com>,
John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
"linux-mips@linux-mips.org" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
"spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net"
<spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V5 16/17] SPI: MIPS: lantiq: add FALCON spi driver
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 15:23:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120530072314.04A153E065C@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <593AEF6C47F46446852B067021A273D6049FCE@MUCSE039.lantiq.com>
On Tue, 29 May 2012 13:05:18 +0000, "Langer Thomas (LQDE CPE AE SW)" <thomas.langer@lantiq.com> wrote:
> Hello Grant, hello John,
>
> John Crispin wrote on 2012-05-26:
> >
> >> What exactly does this mean? How does it not support any other type
> >> of SPI peripheral? SPI is a really simple protocol, so what is it
> >> about this hardware that prevents it being used with other SPI
> >> hardware?
> >>
> >> I see a big state machine that appears to interpret the messages and
> >> pretend to be an SPI slave instead of telling linux about the real
> >> device. /me wonders if it should this instead be a block device
> >> driver?
> >>
> > Thomas will need to comment on this part
> >
> The hardware is an "EBU" (External Bus Unit) for different type of memories
> and flashes (NOR, NAND and serial).
> One of the features of this EBU is the "execute in place" for serial flashes.
> This shows that there is some logic in the hardware for automatic reading,
> all other actions must be done using a specific cmd register.
>
> Even if there are some restrictions from the hardware state machine,
> the goal was to use the standard driver for serial flash devices (m25p80).
> Otherwise, with a dedicated block device driver, we would have to duplicate
> much of this code and had to maintain an own list of supported flash chips.
>
> I hope this reason is good enough for getting this driver accepted.
To be clear, I'm not going to nack the driver over this issue; but it
bothers me that I cannot understand what it is doing and I do wonder
if there is a better approach.
g.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-30 7:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-20 13:46 [PATCH V5 16/17] SPI: MIPS: lantiq: add FALCON spi driver John Crispin
2012-05-25 23:38 ` Grant Likely
2012-05-25 23:38 ` Grant Likely
2012-05-26 13:47 ` John Crispin
2012-05-29 13:05 ` Langer Thomas (LQDE CPE AE SW)
2012-05-29 13:05 ` Langer Thomas (LQDE CPE AE SW)
2012-05-30 7:23 ` Grant Likely [this message]
2012-05-30 7:23 ` Grant Likely
2012-05-30 7:20 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120530072314.04A153E065C@localhost \
--to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=blogic@openwrt.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=thomas.langer@lantiq.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox