Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Wu <tung7970@gmail.com>
To: ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] MIPS: fix sibling call handling in get_frame_info
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 00:04:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130512160429.GA982@hades> (raw)

Given a function, get_frame_info() analyzes its instructions
to figure out frame size and return address. get_frame_info()
works as follows:

1. analyze up to 128 instructions if the function size is unknown
2. search for 'addiu/daddiu sp,sp,-immed' for frame size
3. search for 'sw ra,offset(sp)' for return address
4. end search when it sees jr/jal/jalr

This leads to an issue when the given function is a sibling
call, example shown as follows.

801ca110 <schedule>:
801ca110:       8f820000        lw      v0,0(gp)
801ca114:       8c420000        lw      v0,0(v0)
801ca118:       080726f0        j       801c9bc0 <__schedule>
801ca11c:       00000000        nop

801ca120 <io_schedule>:
801ca120:       27bdffe8        addiu   sp,sp,-24
801ca124:       3c028022        lui     v0,0x8022
801ca128:       afbf0014        sw      ra,20(sp)

In this case, get_frame_info() cannot properly detect schedule's
frame info, and eventually returns io_schedule's instead.

This patch adds 'j' to the end search condition to workaround
sibling call cases.

Signed-off-by: Tony Wu <tung7970@gmail.com>
---
 arch/mips/kernel/process.c |    6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/process.c b/arch/mips/kernel/process.c
index cfc742d..d66b04d 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/process.c
@@ -231,8 +231,10 @@ static inline int is_ra_save_ins(union mips_instruction *ip)
 		ip->i_format.rt == 31;
 }
 
-static inline int is_jal_jalr_jr_ins(union mips_instruction *ip)
+static inline int is_jump_ins(union mips_instruction *ip)
 {
+	if (ip->j_format.opcode == j_op)
+		return 1;
 	if (ip->j_format.opcode == jal_op)
 		return 1;
 	if (ip->r_format.opcode != spec_op)
@@ -268,7 +270,7 @@ static int get_frame_info(struct mips_frame_info *info)
 
 	for (i = 0; i < max_insns; i++, ip++) {
 
-		if (is_jal_jalr_jr_ins(ip))
+		if (is_jump_ins(ip))
 			break;
 		if (!info->frame_size) {
 			if (is_sp_move_ins(ip))
-- 
1.7.10.2 (Apple Git-33)

             reply	other threads:[~2013-05-12 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-12 16:04 Tony Wu [this message]
2013-05-17 23:56 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] MIPS: fix sibling call handling in get_frame_info Ralf Baechle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130512160429.GA982@hades \
    --to=tung7970@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox