From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, mbhat@netlogicmicro.com,
jchandra@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: oprofile: Fix for BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: oprofiled/1362
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 15:57:14 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130802102712.GA5135@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130801163105.GC23583@linux-mips.org>
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 06:31:05PM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 08:40:41PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
>
> > current_cpu_type() is not preemption-safe.
> > If CONFIG_PREEMPT is enabled then mipsxx_reg_setup() can be called from preemptible state.
> > Added get_cpu()/put_cpu() pair to make it preemption-safe.
> >
> > This was found while testing oprofile with CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT enable.
> [...]
>
> Interesting. I wonder how many more of this kind of bug we got lurking
> around.
>
> In case of oprofile, we silently assume that all processors have the same
> number of counters, the same style and number of counters. So it'd be
> ok to just look at the boot CPU which is even simpler than your fix.
>
> What do you think about below fix?
yes, it make sense to compare the cpu_type against boot cpu.
Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ralf
>
> arch/mips/include/asm/cpu-features.h | 2 ++
> arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/cpu-features.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/cpu-features.h
> index 1dc0860..fa44f3e 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/cpu-features.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/cpu-features.h
> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
> #define current_cpu_type() current_cpu_data.cputype
> #endif
>
> +#define boot_cpu_type() cpu_data[0].cputype
> +
> /*
> * SMP assumption: Options of CPU 0 are a superset of all processors.
> * This is true for all known MIPS systems.
> diff --git a/arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c b/arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c
> index e4b1140..3a2b6e9 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/oprofile/op_model_mipsxx.c
> @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static void mipsxx_reg_setup(struct op_counter_config *ctr)
> reg.control[i] |= M_PERFCTL_USER;
> if (ctr[i].exl)
> reg.control[i] |= M_PERFCTL_EXL;
> - if (current_cpu_type() == CPU_XLR)
> + if (boot_cpu_type() == CPU_XLR)
> reg.control[i] |= M_PERFCTL_COUNT_ALL_THREADS;
> reg.counter[i] = 0x80000000 - ctr[i].count;
> }
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-02 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-01 15:10 [PATCH] MIPS: oprofile: Fix for BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: oprofiled/1362 Jerin Jacob
2013-08-01 16:31 ` Ralf Baechle
2013-08-02 10:27 ` Jerin Jacob [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130802102712.GA5135@gmail.com \
--to=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
--cc=jchandra@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=mbhat@netlogicmicro.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox