From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:31:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from alius.ayous.org ([89.238.89.44]:41146 "EHLO alius.ayous.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S6822283AbaCLXbswGcMZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:31:48 +0100 Received: from eos.turmzimmer.net ([2001:a60:f006:aba::1]) by alius.turmzimmer.net with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WNsch-0006N8-UM; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 23:31:44 +0000 Received: from aba by eos.turmzimmer.net with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WNscc-0005yX-Fr; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:31:38 +0100 Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:31:38 +0100 From: Andreas Barth To: John Crispin Cc: Huacai Chen , Ralf Baechle , "Steven J. Hill" , Aurelien Jarno , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Fuxin Zhang , Zhangjin Wu , Hongliang Tao , Hua Yan Subject: Re: [PATCH V19 00/13] MIPS: Add Loongson-3 based machines support Message-ID: <20140312233138.GY12772@mails.so.argh.org> References: <1392537690-5961-1-git-send-email-chenhc@lemote.com> <20140306103017.GX16461@mails.so.argh.org> <532076A7.1040606@phrozen.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <532076A7.1040606@phrozen.org> X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 39462 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: aba@ayous.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips * John Crispin (john@phrozen.org) [140312 16:01]: > Andi, > can we get a reviewed-by from you ? As discussed on IRC I don't think I fullfill the criteria for a Reviewed-by (because I haven't done a technical review of the code; however based on the existing reviews I'm convinved this patch series does fullfill the criteria for inclusion into the mainline kernel, but Reviewed-by is more than just that), but you could add Tested-by: Andreas Barth if you consider that useful. Andi