From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:12:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:40881 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S27012856AbbBPRMmkfS4r (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:12:42 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=roeck-us.net; s=default; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=n9qe+9Nv4L/5ZynE6OpR/bs56nCt7cixNvZ/VEFo01w=; b=lEZiUMi7Ceo+BkL7zGvwnMBmsn5x5H0V8W5np/Q+8oD+RVMrDToJIWCCOlF8XHNkleirhIxQBbqJYadNz7939VPNJfU1HdfnrlFQ5TaSJ5gnY5w6F6ykW+UcET3ldg+gqzvZOdml0k0zgW2huapWNV7PEuKVe4+lD1PxqlCcbus=; Received: from mailnull by bh-25.webhostbox.net with sa-checked (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1YNPDo-001NIM-Gr for linux-mips@linux-mips.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 17:12:36 +0000 Received: from 108-223-40-66.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net ([108.223.40.66]:52612 helo=localhost) by bh-25.webhostbox.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1YNPDT-001N1a-Go; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 17:12:16 +0000 Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 09:12:13 -0800 From: Guenter Roeck To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Markos Chandras , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Ralf Baechle , baspeters93@gmail.com Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 16 Message-ID: <20150216171213.GA2804@roeck-us.net> References: <20120216164144.35e98f5ee8f1b1f545406309@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120216164144.35e98f5ee8f1b1f545406309@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Authenticated_sender: guenter@roeck-us.net X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-CTCH-PVer: 0000001 X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Flags: 0 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020206.54E22504.01CD,ss=1,re=0.001,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 X-CTCH-Score: 0.001 X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000 X-CTCH-Rules: C_4847, X-CTCH-SenderID: linux@roeck-us.net X-CTCH-SenderID-Flags: 0 X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalMessages: 5 X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalSpam: 0 X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalSuspected: 0 X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalConfirmed: 0 X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalBulk: 0 X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalVirus: 0 X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalRecipients: 0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - bh-25.webhostbox.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - linux-mips.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - roeck-us.net X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: bh-25.webhostbox.net: mailgid no entry from get_relayhosts_entry X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 45829 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: linux@roeck-us.net Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 04:41:44PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20120215: > > The net-net tree gained conflicts against the net and wireless trees. > > The fbdev tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit. > > I reverted a commit from the rr tree that causes build failures on some > PowerPC builds. > > The oprofile tree lost its conflict. > > The staging tree gained a build failure so I used the version from > next-20120215. > > The akpm tree gained a conflict against the wireless tree. I also > reverted a patch that caused boot failures on (at least) some PowerPC > servers. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I have created today's linux-next tree at > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git > (patches at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/next/ ). If you > are tracking the linux-next tree using git, you should not use "git pull" > to do so as that will try to merge the new linux-next release with the > old one. You should use "git fetch" as mentioned in the FAQ on the wiki > (see below). > --- [ Trying again, this time hopefully replying to the correct e-mail. Sorry for the earlier noise. ] --- Today's tree has a number of new mips related build errors. Building mips:defconfig ... failed Building mips:allmodconfig ... failed Error log: In file included from ./arch/mips/include/asm/sgiarcs.h:16:0, from ./arch/mips/include/asm/sgialib.h:15, from arch/mips/sgi-ip22/ip22-mc.c:16: ./arch/mips/include/asm/fw/arc/types.h:18:15: error: expected identifier or '(' before '.' token (more of those) In file included from ./arch/mips/include/asm/sgialib.h:15:0, from arch/mips/sgi-ip22/ip22-mc.c:16: ./arch/mips/include/asm/sgiarcs.h:89:2: error: unknown type name '_PULONG' ./arch/mips/include/asm/sgiarcs.h:188:2: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before '.' token ./arch/mips/include/asm/sgiarcs.h:252:2: error: unknown type name '_PLONG' (more of those) In file included from arch/mips/sgi-ip22/ip22-mc.c:16:0: ./arch/mips/include/asm/sgialib.h:20:8: error: expected identifier or '(' before '.' token (more or those) --- Bisect points to commit 9119e8276d ("MIPS: asm: hazards: Add MIPSR6 definitions"). Looking into the patch, I wonder if the following is correct. -#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR2) && !defined(CONFIG_CPU_CAVIUM_OCTEON) +#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR2) || defined(CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR6) && !defined(CONFIG_CPU_CAVIUM_OCTEON) This change appears to be missing a ( ) around the first two defined() statements. Fixing that doesn't resolve the problem, though. Reverting the patch doesn't fix the problem either, so something else must be wrong. ----------------- Building mips:cavium_octeon_defconfig ... failed Error log: arch/mips/kernel/branch.c: In function '__compute_return_epc_for_insn': arch/mips/kernel/branch.c:785:2: error: duplicate case value arch/mips/kernel/branch.c:753:2: error: previously used here arch/mips/kernel/branch.c:808:2: error: duplicate case value arch/mips/kernel/branch.c:769:2: error: previously used here arch/mips/kernel/branch.c:818:2: error: duplicate case value arch/mips/kernel/branch.c:761:2: error: previously used here arch/mips/kernel/branch.c:826:2: error: duplicate case value arch/mips/kernel/branch.c:776:2: error: previously used here ---- Bisect points to commit 2f1da3620ff2 ("MIPS: Emulate the new MIPS R6 branch compact (BC) instruction"). Looking into the code, the patch quite obviously conflicts with cavium support. Guenter