Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
	David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>,
	Markos Chandras <Markos.Chandras@imgtec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] MIPS: Handle page faults of executable but unreadable pages correctly.
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:35:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150723123544.GH8099@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55B0BEB3.7010502@imgtec.com>

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:15:15AM +0100, James Hogan wrote:

> On 23/07/15 10:10, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> > Without this we end taking execeptions in an endless loop hanging the
> > thread.
> 
> A little more explanation would be nice. Under what situations does this
> occur? Does this mean any VM_EXEC and !VM_READ page can't actually be
> faulted in without it being treated as an RI violation, or does it only
> affect when read from kernel emulation code?

> > -			if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_READ)) {
> > +			if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_READ) &&
> > +			    exception_epc(regs) != address) {
> >  #if 0
> >  				pr_notice("Cpu%d[%s:%d:%0*lx:%ld:%0*lx] RI violation\n",
> >  					  raw_smp_processor_id(),
> > 
> 

The general idea is the change the code to treat loads of an instruction
just like an instruction fetch.  Which is achieved by adding the second
condition "exception_epc(regs) != address" to the if above.
exception_epc(regs) == address means

It would all be easier if Linux was enabling the separate exception codes
for read and execution failure but short of that, a test like above must
provide if a fault was an attempted instruction fetch or happend fetching
data.

  Ralf

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-23 12:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-23  9:34 [PATCH 0/2] RIXI fixes Ralf Baechle
2015-07-23  9:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] MIPS: Handle page faults of executable but unreadable pages correctly Ralf Baechle
2015-07-23 10:15   ` James Hogan
2015-07-23 10:15     ` James Hogan
2015-07-23 12:35     ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2015-07-23  9:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] MIPS: Partially disable RIXI support Ralf Baechle
2015-07-23 10:06   ` James Hogan
2015-07-23 10:06     ` James Hogan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150723123544.GH8099@linux-mips.org \
    --to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=Markos.Chandras@imgtec.com \
    --cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox