From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>,
Markos Chandras <Markos.Chandras@imgtec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] MIPS: Handle page faults of executable but unreadable pages correctly.
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:35:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150723123544.GH8099@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55B0BEB3.7010502@imgtec.com>
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:15:15AM +0100, James Hogan wrote:
> On 23/07/15 10:10, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> > Without this we end taking execeptions in an endless loop hanging the
> > thread.
>
> A little more explanation would be nice. Under what situations does this
> occur? Does this mean any VM_EXEC and !VM_READ page can't actually be
> faulted in without it being treated as an RI violation, or does it only
> affect when read from kernel emulation code?
> > - if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_READ)) {
> > + if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_READ) &&
> > + exception_epc(regs) != address) {
> > #if 0
> > pr_notice("Cpu%d[%s:%d:%0*lx:%ld:%0*lx] RI violation\n",
> > raw_smp_processor_id(),
> >
>
The general idea is the change the code to treat loads of an instruction
just like an instruction fetch. Which is achieved by adding the second
condition "exception_epc(regs) != address" to the if above.
exception_epc(regs) == address means
It would all be easier if Linux was enabling the separate exception codes
for read and execution failure but short of that, a test like above must
provide if a fault was an attempted instruction fetch or happend fetching
data.
Ralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-23 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-23 9:34 [PATCH 0/2] RIXI fixes Ralf Baechle
2015-07-23 9:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] MIPS: Handle page faults of executable but unreadable pages correctly Ralf Baechle
2015-07-23 10:15 ` James Hogan
2015-07-23 10:15 ` James Hogan
2015-07-23 12:35 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2015-07-23 9:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] MIPS: Partially disable RIXI support Ralf Baechle
2015-07-23 10:06 ` James Hogan
2015-07-23 10:06 ` James Hogan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150723123544.GH8099@linux-mips.org \
--to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=Markos.Chandras@imgtec.com \
--cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox