Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
To: Markos Chandras <Markos.Chandras@imgtec.com>
Cc: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
	libc-alpha@sourceware.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
	kumba@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips: siginfo.h: add SIGSYS details [BZ #18863]
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 18:09:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150827220904.GD29734@vapier> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55DEC3B9.1070105@imgtec.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1603 bytes --]

On 27 Aug 2015 09:00, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 08/26/2015 06:10 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 26 Aug 2015 09:30, Joseph Myers wrote:
> >> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>> Linux 3.13 added SIGSYS details to siginfo_t; update glibc's copy to
> >>> keep in sync with it.
> >>>
> >>> 2015-08-25  Mike Frysinger  <vapier@gentoo.org>
> >>>
> >>> 	[BZ #18863]
> >>> 	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/bits/siginfo.h (siginfo_t): Add _sigsys.
> >>> 	(si_call_addr): Define.
> >>> 	(si_syscall): Define.
> >>> 	(si_arch): Define.
> >>
> >> OK.  CC to linux-mips because I see that the MIPS implementation of 
> >> copy_siginfo_to_user32 doesn't handle __SI_SYS, unlike arm64 at least, so 
> >> I suspect this won't in fact work for n32 or for o32 with a 64-bit kernel.
> > 
> > i'm getting reports of seccomp misbehavior on mips already which is what
> > started me down this glibc path.  i suspect the original port was tested
> > against o32 kernels only.
> > -mike
> > 
> 
> I have recently tested mips64 n64/n32 with the testsuite from libseccomp
> and that led me to this fix
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=9f161439e4104b641a7bfb9b89581d801159fec8
> 
> if you are aware of other problems (and perhaps a test to trigger them)
> that could be kernel related let me know

i was waiting on kumba to file a bug, and recover my mips box when i got
local access to it again to check another report.  but if libseccomp is
passing its unittests now as n64/n32 userland, i think that should cover
things.
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2015-08-27 22:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1440563342-5411-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org>
2015-08-26  9:30 ` [PATCH] mips: siginfo.h: add SIGSYS details [BZ #18863] Joseph Myers
2015-08-26  9:30   ` Joseph Myers
2015-08-26 17:10   ` Mike Frysinger
2015-08-27  8:00     ` Markos Chandras
2015-08-27  8:00       ` Markos Chandras
2015-08-27  9:41       ` Joseph Myers
2015-08-27  9:41         ` Joseph Myers
2015-08-27  9:56         ` Markos Chandras
2015-08-27  9:56           ` Markos Chandras
2015-08-27 22:09       ` Mike Frysinger [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150827220904.GD29734@vapier \
    --to=vapier@gentoo.org \
    --cc=Markos.Chandras@imgtec.com \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=kumba@gentoo.org \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox