From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:07:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:55311 "EHLO linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S27007687AbbIXHHsqNblb (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:07:48 +0200 Received: from scotty.linux-mips.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.15.2/8.14.8) with ESMTP id t8O77j8L022006; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:07:45 +0200 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id t8O77ivS021997; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:07:44 +0200 Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:07:44 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Paul Burton Cc: Sudip Mukherjee , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Maciej W. Rozycki" , linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 23 Message-ID: <20150924070744.GD21784@linux-mips.org> References: <20150923142343.35797c0f@canb.auug.org.au> <20150923074207.GA27002@sudip-pc> <20150923214236.GA28778@NP-P-BURTON> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150923214236.GA28778@NP-P-BURTON> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 49351 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 02:42:36PM -0700, Paul Burton wrote: > Hi Ralf, > > That patch as I submitted it definitely adds arch/mips/mm/sc-debugfs.c > but somehow that file has been lost from the commit in your > mips-for-linux-next tree. Could you re-apply it? Thanks for reporting. The patch didn't apply cleanly and when applying it manually I forgot to git-add the new file. Of course the file was in the local repo so my test builds did succeed. I fixed that now. Ralf