From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 07 Jan 2016 19:19:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:37148 "EHLO linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S27014696AbcAGSTXZlnPe (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jan 2016 19:19:23 +0100 Received: from scotty.linux-mips.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.15.2/8.14.8) with ESMTP id u07IJMKg013833; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 19:19:22 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u07IJKDG013832; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 19:19:20 +0100 Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 19:19:20 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michal Marek , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, James Hogan Subject: Re: [PATCH] ld-version: fix it on Fedora Message-ID: <20160107181920.GE17031@linux-mips.org> References: <1452189189-31188-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1452189189-31188-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 50965 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 07:55:24PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fedora 23, ld --version outputs: > GNU ld version 2.25-15.fc23 > > But ld-version.sh fails to parse this, so e.g. mips build fails to > enable VDSO, printing a warning that binutils >= 2.24 is required. > > To fix, teach ld-version to parse this format. > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > --- > > Which tree should this be merged through? Mine? MIPS? MIPS is the sole user of ld-ifversion at this time and taking this through the MIPS tree will avoid possible merge conflicts with James Hogan's pending d5ece1cb074b2c7082c9a2948ac598dd0ad40657 fix ("Fix ld-version.sh to handle large 3rd version part"). So I think I should take this through the MIPS tree. Thanks! Ralf