From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 03 Feb 2017 21:44:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:43494 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S23993912AbdBCUobuDTL5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Feb 2017 21:44:31 +0100 Received: from localhost (unknown [37.169.168.106]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 14BCE7A9; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 20:44:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 21:44:27 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Florian Fainelli Cc: Joe Perches , "Jayachandran C." , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Ralf Baechle , linux-mips Subject: Re: Is it time to move drivers/staging/netlogic/ out of staging? Message-ID: <20170203204427.GA14959@kroah.com> References: <1486147623.22276.70.camel@perches.com> <1486148236.22276.72.camel@perches.com> <20170203203609.GA14271@kroah.com> <50640771-abc2-dd9a-7418-7393afe23cd5@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50640771-abc2-dd9a-7418-7393afe23cd5@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 56633 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 12:38:45PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 02/03/2017 12:36 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 10:57:16AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > >> On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 10:50 -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > >>> (with JC's other email) > >> > >> And now with Greg's proper email too > >> > >>> On 02/03/2017 10:47 AM, Joe Perches wrote: > >>>> 64 bit stats isn't implemented, but is that really necessary? > >>>> Anything else? > >>> > >>> Joe, do you have such hardware that you are interested in getting > >>> supported, or was that just to reduce the amount of drivers in staging? > >>> I am really not clear about what happened to that entire product line, > >>> and whether there is any interest in having anything supported these days... > >> > >> No hardware. Just to reduce staging driver count. > > > > Without hardware or a "real" maintainer, it shouldn't be moved. > > > > Heck, if no one has the hardware, let's just delete the thing. > > I do have one, and other colleagues have some too, but I am not heavily > using it, nor do I have many cycles to spend on that... sounds like we > could keep it in staging for another 6 months and see what happens then? Well, if it works for you, want to maintain it? :)