From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:45:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:44300 "EHLO linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S23993944AbdFMJpaPuQfv (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:45:30 +0200 Received: from h7.dl5rb.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by h7.dl5rb.org.uk (8.15.2/8.14.8) with ESMTP id v5D9jR3L009751; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:45:27 +0200 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by h7.dl5rb.org.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v5D9jPbI009750; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:45:25 +0200 Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:45:25 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Huacai Chen Cc: John Crispin , "Steven J. Hill" , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Fuxin Zhang , Zhangjin Wu Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 4/9] MIPS: Loongson-3: Support 4 packages in CPU Hwmon driver Message-ID: <20170613094525.GB31492@linux-mips.org> References: <1496718888-18324-1-git-send-email-chenhc@lemote.com> <1496718888-18324-4-git-send-email-chenhc@lemote.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1496718888-18324-4-git-send-email-chenhc@lemote.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 58420 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 11:14:43AM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote: (Fixing the Steven.Hill@imgtec.com address on cc, this email address is stale since a long time. Steven is now Steven.Hill@cavium.com. > Loongson-3 machines may have as many as 4 physical packages. Any reason why not dynamically allocating all structures, static allocations just won't scale to many packages nor are they very maintenance friendly. Ralf