From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 07 Aug 2017 23:36:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:35000 "EHLO linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S23995120AbdHGVgHNZflM (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Aug 2017 23:36:07 +0200 Received: from h7.dl5rb.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by h7.dl5rb.org.uk (8.15.2/8.14.8) with ESMTP id v77La3jL025292; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 23:36:04 +0200 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by h7.dl5rb.org.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v77La3mZ025291; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 23:36:03 +0200 Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 23:36:03 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Paul Burton Cc: Nathan Sullivan , robh+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] MIPS: NI 169445 board support Message-ID: <20170807213603.GE3509@linux-mips.org> References: <1500402549-12090-1-git-send-email-nathan.sullivan@ni.com> <20170807152648.GA13214@linux-mips.org> <11583742.zienCqJRO5@np-p-burton> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <11583742.zienCqJRO5@np-p-burton> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 59400 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 10:24:05AM -0700, Paul Burton wrote: > One possibility would be for us to split the board portions of vmlinux.its.S > out into a file per-board, perhaps board-boston.its.S, board-ni169445.its.S > etc. The build process would then have to concatenate the right files to > generate the full image tree source. > > Does that sound good to you? Yes, that sounds good. Ralf