From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:55:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]:43643 "EHLO mail.bootlin.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S23990864AbeB0PzBnCURC (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:55:01 +0100 Received: by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id ACA1D2087E; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:54:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (242.171.71.37.rev.sfr.net [37.71.171.242]) by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76FB32087A; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:54:43 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:54:44 +0100 From: Alexandre Belloni To: James Hogan Cc: Ralf Baechle , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] MIPS: mscc: add ocelot PCB123 device tree Message-ID: <20180227155444.GB15333@piout.net> References: <20180116101240.5393-1-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <20180116101240.5393-7-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <20180214170042.GE3986@saruman> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180214170042.GE3986@saruman> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 62724 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On 14/02/2018 at 17:00:42 +0000, James Hogan wrote: > On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:12:38AM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > Add a device tree for the Microsemi Ocelot PCB123 evaluation board. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni > > Please Cc DT folk. > I can do but again, I don't think they care. > > diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/mscc/ocelot_pcb123.dts b/arch/mips/boot/dts/mscc/ocelot_pcb123.dts > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..42bd404471f6 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/mscc/ocelot_pcb123.dts > > @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT) */ > > +/* Copyright (c) 2017 Microsemi Corporation */ > > + > > +/dts-v1/; > > + > > +#include "ocelot.dtsi" > > + > > +/ { > > + compatible = "mscc,ocelot-pcb123", "mscc,ocelot"; > > Should mscc,ocelot-pcb123 be added to the mscc DT binding documentation > in the other patch? > On ARM at least, we don't document the board compatibles because this will be a huge list without much benefit as they are mostly unused. Still, it is nice to have in case something specific needs to be done for a particular board (and hopefully this never happens). also, I don't think any other MIPS boards are documented bu if you insist, I can either add it in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/mscc.txt or create a new file to list all the mips board compatibles. -- Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com