From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 11 Sep 2018 08:42:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:59104 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S23990473AbeIKGmN3wV80 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2018 08:42:13 +0200 Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id B854F67357; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 08:46:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 08:46:36 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Christoph Hellwig , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Marek Szyprowski , Robin Murphy , Paul Burton , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] dma-mapping: move the dma_coherent flag to struct device Message-ID: <20180911064636.GA6214@lst.de> References: <20180910060533.27172-1-hch@lst.de> <20180910060533.27172-3-hch@lst.de> <20180910161350.GA10380@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180910161350.GA10380@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 66194 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: hch@lst.de Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 06:13:50PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_DEVICE) || \ > > + defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_CPU) || \ > > + defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_CPU_ALL) > > + bool dma_coherent:1; > > +#endif > > It's just one bit, why not always have it enabled here? If the arch > uses it or doesn't, no big deal. > > Or are you using this to "catch" arches that mess something up? Yes, that is the intent - I don't want architectures to accidentally set it while not selecting the non-coherent infrastructure, as it won't have an effect.