From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 29 Oct 2018 11:45:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk ([IPv6:2001:4d48:ad52:3201:214:fdff:fe10:1be6]:42874 "EHLO pandora.armlinux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S23992087AbeJ2KphhlOUQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2018 11:45:37 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2014; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=8Ualk9jtkWpjB7bYVqz+vL2mjxb2tON7rk5yFRjsZiY=; b=iFgYPtVn6CfKr9y0zoGZhB96M sfibn3qSfl8xZi14MnhfT4+mfYNtMPMn7lS+kZiMYrW0qp7lIh9KKlQJKv1/epan7fdFFOQpc9QCX 6m7LyWVG8qVtmFyzCz0k6PODEai84MFC4+80F67NZfIyLLECggMuol3vQ9Mhi2smGEqJI=; Received: from n2100.armlinux.org.uk ([2001:4d48:ad52:3201:214:fdff:fe10:4f86]:47390) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1gH52M-00044N-G1; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 10:44:46 +0000 Received: from linux by n2100.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1gH52J-00084H-4y; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 10:44:43 +0000 Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 10:44:41 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Will Deacon Cc: Maksym Kokhan , Daniel Walker , Andrew Morton , Rob Herring , Frank Rowand , Ard Biesheuvel , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, Catalin Marinas , Ralf Baechle , Paul Burton , James Hogan , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , Daniel Walker , Andrii Bordunov , Ruslan Bilovol , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] add generic builtin command line Message-ID: <20181029104441.GF30658@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> References: <1538067309-5711-1-git-send-email-maksym.kokhan@globallogic.com> <20180929181725.GB27441@fifo99.com> <20181023144815.GP30658@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> <20181024090732.GS30658@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> <20181029102914.GA14127@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181029102914.GA14127@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 66973 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: linux@armlinux.org.uk Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 10:29:15AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 10:07:32AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 11:57:44AM +0300, Maksym Kokhan wrote: > > > Do you mean, that you haven't seen patch for ARM, which I sent on > > > September 27 along with cover and patch 1? It is strange, because > > > you was the one from recipients. If so, you can see this patch here: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/992779/ > > > > It seems that I have received patch 5, _but_ it's not threaded with > > the cover message and patch 1. With 50k messages in my inbox, and 3k > > messages since you sent the series, it's virtually impossible to find > > it (I only found it by looking at my mail server logs from September > > to find the subject, and then searching my mailbox for that subject.) > > > > This is unnecessarily difficult. > > This comes up surprisingly often, and I think part of the issue is that > different maintainers have different preferences. I also prefer to receive > the entire series and cover-letter, but I've seen people object to being > CC'd on the whole series as well (how they manage to review things in > isolation is another question...!) This series has the odd situation where patch 1 is threaded to the cover letter, but nothing else is - that makes it inconsistent. Where I've seen people disagree with threading is when sending follow-up series - whether that should be threaded to the previous series or not - some people want it others hate it. However, I haven't seen any disagreement is about having the patches threaded to the cover. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up