From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>,
James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>,
Nitin Gupta <nitin.m.gupta@oracle.com>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 5.1-rc5
Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 16:15:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190502231542.GA9336@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wj7jgMOVFW0tiU-X+zhg6+Rn7mEBTej+f26rV3zXezOSA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 09:17:10AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I ruthlessly also entirely ignored MIPS, SH and sparc, since they seem
> largely irrelevant, partly since even theoretically this whole issue
> needs a _lot_ of memory.
Adding the relevant people - while the might be irrelevant, at least
mips and sparc have some giant memory systems. And I'd really like
to see the arch-specific GUP implementations to go away for other
reasons, as we have a few issues to sort out with GUP usage now
(we just had discussions at LSF/MM), and the less implementations we
have to deal with the better.
parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-02 23:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <CAHk-=wj7jgMOVFW0tiU-X+zhg6+Rn7mEBTej+f26rV3zXezOSA@mail.gmail.com>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190502231542.GA9336@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
--cc=jhogan@kernel.org \
--cc=khalid.aziz@oracle.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nitin.m.gupta@oracle.com \
--cc=paul.burton@mips.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stsp@list.ru \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).