From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C472EC47404 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 23:00:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9369A222CA for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 23:00:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1570316439; bh=jNhO1yhzGmSxpfUauYxPl/dwBJJO9Ob403LUDD3Bg+Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=GisiFJ9jNzwosWsBQJ9GFviAnoYXWyNfY/4snpJwVBGmSxnBxTUaP99yJ9UzTFi5e r41Min/JkFcxasQHX8Hbzi7W+HeXg4zvDhYUMwCU2/OmfW84xQUhMlirBvPNNtGJ/z hFS642apb542p8KusS3jtcZjcSgxCW5hKEfbQt64= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725966AbfJEXAj (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Oct 2019 19:00:39 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:51026 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725947AbfJEXAj (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Oct 2019 19:00:39 -0400 Received: from localhost (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C6574222C5; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 23:00:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1570316438; bh=jNhO1yhzGmSxpfUauYxPl/dwBJJO9Ob403LUDD3Bg+Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=YNaXatoOwa/0IdJBMX+mRjlIeFMz4GkAT5W8RUCWhl3BkW1NLTl/9B0lgMloyKZLd LoQ5dTmMajZ3BTzoFiGWTTNA9+iqYUJf8fZSMkAVg8X0pVbnHZY3lWUWj/Qv4WzOB/ oHvVrKf1hQYoUv8A/SUj9T234TIgtseI9C3HCQEg= Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2019 19:00:36 -0400 From: Sasha Levin To: Hauke Mehrtens Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Martin Blumenstingl , Paul Burton , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, john@phrozen.org, kishon@ti.com, ralf@linux-mips.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, ms@dev.tdt.de Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 17/42] MIPS: lantiq: update the clock alias' for the mainline PCIe PHY driver Message-ID: <20191005230036.GB25255@sasha-vm> References: <20190929173244.8918-1-sashal@kernel.org> <20190929173244.8918-17-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-mips-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 07:39:49PM +0200, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: >On 9/29/19 7:32 PM, Sasha Levin wrote: >> From: Martin Blumenstingl >> >> [ Upstream commit ed90302be64a53d9031c8ce05428c358b16a5d96 ] >> >> The mainline PCIe PHY driver has it's own devicetree node. Update the >> clock alias so the mainline driver finds the clocks. >> >> The first PCIe PHY is located at 0x1f106800 and exists on VRX200, ARX300 >> and GRX390. >> The second PCIe PHY is located at 0x1f700400 and exists on ARX300 and >> GRX390. >> The third PCIe PHY is located at 0x1f106a00 and exists onl on GRX390. >> Lantiq's board support package (called "UGW") names these registers >> "PDI". >> >> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl >> Signed-off-by: Paul Burton >> Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: john@phrozen.org >> Cc: kishon@ti.com >> Cc: ralf@linux-mips.org >> Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: hauke@hauke-m.de >> Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com >> Cc: ms@dev.tdt.de >> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin >> --- >> arch/mips/lantiq/xway/sysctrl.c | 16 ++++++++-------- >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > >Hi Sasha, > >This change only makes sense with the new upstream PCIe phy driver which >was added to kernel 5.4 [0], older kernel versions do not have this PCIe >PHY driver. I would not backport these changes to older kernel versions. I'll drop it, thank you! -- Thanks, Sasha