From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Linux Samsung SOC <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Robin Gong <yibin.gong@nxp.com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dma-direct: unify the dma_capable definitions
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 17:46:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191119164652.GA18983@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a3e2d65b-7270-9555-a251-d7ed0c4fb85c@samsung.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 336 bytes --]
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 11:26:39AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Christoph: Let me know if this is a proper fix for you, then I will send
> it as a full patch.
Besides the point from Robin, which is really older than you patch
I'm not a fan of duplicating dma_capable here. Let me know what you
think of the two attached patches.
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-dma-direct-don-t-check-swiotlb-force-in-dma_direct_m.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1076 bytes --]
From db897c2ec63e7af78137c533c9f821c594896167 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 17:35:36 +0100
Subject: dma-direct: don't check swiotlb=force in dma_direct_map_resource
When mapping resources we can't just use swiotlb ram for bounce
buffering. Switch to a direct dma_capable check instead.
Fixes: cfced786969c ("dma-mapping: remove the default map_resource implementation")
Reported-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
kernel/dma/direct.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c
index 077876ae5c74..a479bd2d1e8b 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/direct.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c
@@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ dma_addr_t dma_direct_map_resource(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t paddr,
{
dma_addr_t dma_addr = paddr;
- if (unlikely(!dma_direct_possible(dev, dma_addr, size))) {
+ if (unlikely(!dma_capable(dev, dma_addr, size))) {
report_addr(dev, dma_addr, size);
return DMA_MAPPING_ERROR;
}
--
2.20.1
[-- Attachment #3: 0002-dma-direct-exclude-dma_direct_map_resource-from-the-.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 4755 bytes --]
From fd82d238a42e3a5f12dd0621db2c724b89509b02 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 17:38:58 +0100
Subject: dma-direct: exclude dma_direct_map_resource from the min_low_pfn
check
The valid memory address check in dma_capable only makes sense when mapping
normal memory, not when using dma_map_resource to map a device resource.
Add a new boolean argument to dma_capable to exclude that check for the
dma_map_resource case.
Fixes: b12d66278dd6 ("dma-direct: check for overflows on 32 bit DMA addresses")
Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
arch/x86/kernel/amd_gart_64.c | 4 ++--
drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | 4 ++--
include/linux/dma-direct.h | 5 +++--
kernel/dma/direct.c | 4 ++--
kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_gart_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_gart_64.c
index a6ac3712db8b..5cfab41e8509 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_gart_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_gart_64.c
@@ -185,13 +185,13 @@ static void iommu_full(struct device *dev, size_t size, int dir)
static inline int
need_iommu(struct device *dev, unsigned long addr, size_t size)
{
- return force_iommu || !dma_capable(dev, addr, size);
+ return force_iommu || !dma_capable(dev, addr, size, true);
}
static inline int
nonforced_iommu(struct device *dev, unsigned long addr, size_t size)
{
- return !dma_capable(dev, addr, size);
+ return !dma_capable(dev, addr, size, true);
}
/* Map a single continuous physical area into the IOMMU.
diff --git a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
index 3f8b2cdb4acb..b6d27762c6f8 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ static dma_addr_t xen_swiotlb_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
* we can safely return the device addr and not worry about bounce
* buffering it.
*/
- if (dma_capable(dev, dev_addr, size) &&
+ if (dma_capable(dev, dev_addr, size, true) &&
!range_straddles_page_boundary(phys, size) &&
!xen_arch_need_swiotlb(dev, phys, dev_addr) &&
swiotlb_force != SWIOTLB_FORCE)
@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ static dma_addr_t xen_swiotlb_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
/*
* Ensure that the address returned is DMA'ble
*/
- if (unlikely(!dma_capable(dev, dev_addr, size))) {
+ if (unlikely(!dma_capable(dev, dev_addr, size, true))) {
swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(dev, map, size, size, dir,
attrs | DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC);
return DMA_MAPPING_ERROR;
diff --git a/include/linux/dma-direct.h b/include/linux/dma-direct.h
index f8959f75e496..99b77dd5f79b 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-direct.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-direct.h
@@ -49,14 +49,15 @@ static inline phys_addr_t dma_to_phys(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t daddr)
return __sme_clr(__dma_to_phys(dev, daddr));
}
-static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr, size_t size)
+static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr, size_t size,
+ bool is_ram)
{
dma_addr_t end = addr + size - 1;
if (!dev->dma_mask)
return false;
- if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT) &&
+ if (is_ram && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT) &&
min(addr, end) < phys_to_dma(dev, PFN_PHYS(min_low_pfn)))
return false;
diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c
index a479bd2d1e8b..40f1f0aac4b1 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/direct.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ static inline bool dma_direct_possible(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr,
size_t size)
{
return swiotlb_force != SWIOTLB_FORCE &&
- dma_capable(dev, dma_addr, size);
+ dma_capable(dev, dma_addr, size, true);
}
dma_addr_t dma_direct_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
@@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ dma_addr_t dma_direct_map_resource(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t paddr,
{
dma_addr_t dma_addr = paddr;
- if (unlikely(!dma_capable(dev, dma_addr, size))) {
+ if (unlikely(!dma_capable(dev, dma_addr, size, false))) {
report_addr(dev, dma_addr, size);
return DMA_MAPPING_ERROR;
}
diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
index 673a2cdb2656..9280d6f8271e 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
@@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ bool swiotlb_map(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t *phys, dma_addr_t *dma_addr,
/* Ensure that the address returned is DMA'ble */
*dma_addr = __phys_to_dma(dev, *phys);
- if (unlikely(!dma_capable(dev, *dma_addr, size))) {
+ if (unlikely(!dma_capable(dev, *dma_addr, size, true))) {
swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(dev, *phys, size, size, dir,
attrs | DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC);
return false;
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-19 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-13 7:35 unify the dma_capable definition Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-13 7:35 ` [PATCH 1/3] dma-direct: unify the dma_capable definitions Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-14 8:47 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-11-19 9:27 ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-11-19 9:44 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2019-11-19 10:26 ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-11-19 16:16 ` Robin Murphy
2019-11-19 16:46 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-11-20 6:31 ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-11-19 10:19 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-11-13 7:35 ` [PATCH 2/3] dma-direct: avoid a forward declaration for phys_to_dma Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-13 7:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: remove support for NULL dev in __phys_to_dma / __dma_to_phys Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-14 8:48 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-11-13 10:18 ` unify the dma_capable definition Nicolas Saenz Julienne
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191119164652.GA18983@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=nsaenzjulienne@suse.de \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=yibin.gong@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).