Re: [PATCH 03/15] selftests/seccomp: mips: Define SYSCALL_NUM_SET macro

Christian Brauner
2020-09-15T22:43:42Z

On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 04:08:08AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Remove the mips special-case in change_syscall().
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 17 +++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
> index 1c83e743bfb1..02a9a6599746 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
> @@ -1742,6 +1742,13 @@ TEST_F(TRACE_poke, getpid_runs_normally)
> # define ARCH_REGS struct pt_regs
> # define SYSCALL_NUM(_regs) (_regs).regs[2]
> # define SYSCALL_SYSCALL_NUM regs[4]
> +# define SYSCALL_NUM_SET(_regs, _nr) \
> + do { \
> + if ((_regs).regs[2] == __NR_O32_Linux) \
> + (_regs).regs[4] = _nr; \
> + else \
> + (_regs).regs[2] = _nr; \
> + } while (0)

I think that

# define SYSCALL_NUM_SET(_regs, _nr) \
do { \
if (SYSCALL_NUM(_regs) == __NR_O32_Linux) \
(_regs).regs[4] = _nr; \
else \
(_regs).regs[2] = _nr; \
} while (0)

would read better but that's just a matter of taste. :)

Looks good!
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>