From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=JwHR=EF=vger.kernel.org=linux-mips-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,
	USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D65B2C63697
	for <linux-mips@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 07:25:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87F672223F
	for <linux-mips@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 07:25:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1726009AbgJ3HZQ (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-mips@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 30 Oct 2020 03:25:16 -0400
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:51843 "EHLO verein.lst.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1725780AbgJ3HZP (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 30 Oct 2020 03:25:15 -0400
Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407)
        id 1A01067373; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 08:25:08 +0100 (CET)
Date:   Fri, 30 Oct 2020 08:25:08 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Paul McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        x86@kernel.org, Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>,
        linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
        linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
        linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Nick Hu <nickhu@andestech.com>,
        Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com>,
        Vincent Chen <deanbo422@gmail.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
        Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
        linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org
Subject: Re: [patch V2 00/18] mm/highmem: Preemptible variant of
 kmap_atomic & friends
Message-ID: <20201030072508.GA18471@lst.de>
References: <20201029221806.189523375@linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20201029221806.189523375@linutronix.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-mips.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 11:18:06PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> This is achieved by:

...

> 
>  - Consolidating all kmap atomic implementations in generic code

...

> Though I wanted to share the current state of affairs before investigating
> that further. If there is consensus in going forward with this, I'll have a
> deeper look into this issue.

I think the consolidation is a winner no matter where we go next.  Maybe
split it out in a prep series so we can get it in ASAP?