From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] MIPS: Remove get_fs/set_fs
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 13:41:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210331114119.GA10555@alpha.franken.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210330175417.GC15145@lst.de>
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 07:54:17PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > - if (likely(access_ok( __gu_ptr, size))) { \
> > - if (eva_kernel_access()) \
> > - __get_kernel_common((x), size, __gu_ptr); \
>
> FYI, it might be a good idea to fold __{get,put}_kernel_common into
> __{get,put}_kernel_nofault now that these are the only callers left.
__get_data macro used it, but I rewrote it, so I could fold in
__get/__put_kernel_common.
> Similarly __get_user_common and __put_user_common should probably also
> go away.
__get_user_common is used 3 times and __put_user_common twice. So I
left them as they are.
> > static inline unsigned long
> > raw_copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
> > {
> > + return __invoke_copy_to_user(to, from, n);
>
> I think __invoke_copy_to_user, __invoke_copy_from_user and
> ___invoke_copy_in_user can go away now as well.
done.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-31 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-30 17:26 [PATCH 0/3] MIPS: Remove get_fs/set_fs Thomas Bogendoerfer
2021-03-30 17:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] MIPS: uaccess: Added __get/__put_kernel_nofault Thomas Bogendoerfer
2021-03-30 17:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-30 20:02 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2021-03-30 17:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] MIPS: uaccess: Remove get_fs/set_fs call sites Thomas Bogendoerfer
2021-03-30 17:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-30 20:02 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2021-03-30 22:10 ` David Laight
2021-03-30 17:27 ` [PATCH 3/3] MIPS: Remove get_fs/set_fs Thomas Bogendoerfer
2021-03-30 17:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-31 11:41 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210331114119.GA10555@alpha.franken.de \
--to=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).