From: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
To: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: "Allen Pais" <apais@linux.microsoft.com>,
"Sumit Garg" <sumit.garg@linaro.org>,
"Peter Huewe" <peterhuewe@gmx.de>,
"Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@kernel.org>,
"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
"Vikas Gupta" <vikas.gupta@broadcom.com>,
"Thirupathaiah Annapureddy" <thiruan@microsoft.com>,
"Pavel Tatashin" <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
"Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>,
op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/8] optee: Clear stale cache entries during initialization
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 21:15:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210614191506.GA1373417@jade> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210614190646.GW4910@sequoia>
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 02:06:46PM -0500, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> On 2021-06-14 10:27:15, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 04:09:09PM -0500, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> > > The shm cache could contain invalid addresses if
> > > optee_disable_shm_cache() was not called from the .shutdown hook of the
> > > previous kernel before a kexec. These addresses could be unmapped or
> > > they could point to mapped but unintended locations in memory.
> > >
> > > Clear the shared memory cache, while being careful to not translate the
> > > addresses returned from OPTEE_SMC_DISABLE_SHM_CACHE, during driver
> > > initialization. Once all pre-cache shm objects are removed, proceed with
> > > enabling the cache so that we know that we can handle cached shm objects
> > > with confidence later in the .shutdown hook.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/tee/optee/call.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> > > drivers/tee/optee/core.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> > > drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h | 2 +-
> > > 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/call.c b/drivers/tee/optee/call.c
> > > index 6e6eb836e9b6..5dcba6105ed7 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/tee/optee/call.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/call.c
> > > @@ -419,8 +419,10 @@ void optee_enable_shm_cache(struct optee *optee)
> > > * optee_disable_shm_cache() - Disables caching of some shared memory allocation
> > > * in OP-TEE
> > > * @optee: main service struct
> > > + * @is_mapped: true if the cached shared memory addresses were mapped by this
> > > + * kernel, are safe to dereference, and should be freed
> > > */
> > > -void optee_disable_shm_cache(struct optee *optee)
> > > +void optee_disable_shm_cache(struct optee *optee, bool is_mapped)
> > > {
> > > struct optee_call_waiter w;
> > >
> > > @@ -439,6 +441,13 @@ void optee_disable_shm_cache(struct optee *optee)
> > > if (res.result.status == OPTEE_SMC_RETURN_OK) {
> > > struct tee_shm *shm;
> > >
> > > + /*
> > > + * Shared memory references that were not mapped by
> > > + * this kernel must be ignored to prevent a crash.
> > > + */
> > > + if (!is_mapped)
> > > + continue;
> > > +
> > > shm = reg_pair_to_ptr(res.result.shm_upper32,
> > > res.result.shm_lower32);
> > > tee_shm_free(shm);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/core.c b/drivers/tee/optee/core.c
> > > index 0987074d7ed0..6974e1104bd4 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/tee/optee/core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/core.c
> > > @@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ static int optee_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > * reference counters and also avoid wild pointers in secure world
> > > * into the old shared memory range.
> > > */
> > > - optee_disable_shm_cache(optee);
> > > + optee_disable_shm_cache(optee, true);
> >
> > Naked "true" or "false" parameters are normally not very descriptive.
> > Would it make sense to write this as:
> > optee_disable_shm_cache(optee, true /*is_mapped*/);
> > instead (same for the other call sites in this patch)? That way it would
> > be easier to see what it is that is true or false.
>
> Yeah, I understand the issue with the naked bools. What about turning
> 'optee_disable_shm_cache(struct optee *optee, bool is_mapped)' into
> '__optee_disable_shm_cache(struct optee *optee, bool is_mapped)' and
> introducing these two wrappers:
>
> /**
> * optee_disable_shm_cache() - Disables caching of mapped shared memory
> * allocations in OP-TEE
> * @optee: main service struct
> */
> void optee_disable_shm_cache(struct optee *optee)
> {
> return __optee_disable_shm_cache(optee, true);
> }
>
> /**
> * optee_disable_unmapped_shm_cache() - Disables caching of shared memory
> * allocations in OP-TEE which are not
> * currently mapped
> * @optee: main service struct
> */
> void optee_disable_unmapped_shm_cache(struct optee *optee)
> {
> return __optee_disable_shm_cache(optee, false);
> }
>
> Existing callers of optee_disable_shm_cache() remain unchanged and we just add
> one caller of optee_disable_unmapped_shm_cache() with this patch.
>
Sounds good.
Jens
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-14 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-10 21:09 [PATCH v4 0/8] tee: Improve support for kexec and kdump Tyler Hicks
2021-06-10 21:09 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] optee: Fix memory leak when failing to register shm pages Tyler Hicks
2021-06-11 9:05 ` Jens Wiklander
2021-06-10 21:09 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] optee: Refuse to load the driver under the kdump kernel Tyler Hicks
2021-06-11 9:08 ` Jens Wiklander
2021-06-10 21:09 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] optee: fix tee out of memory failure seen during kexec reboot Tyler Hicks
2021-06-11 9:11 ` Jens Wiklander
2021-06-11 12:53 ` Tyler Hicks
2021-06-14 7:21 ` Jens Wiklander
2021-06-14 7:22 ` Jens Wiklander
2021-06-10 21:09 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] optee: Clear stale cache entries during initialization Tyler Hicks
2021-06-14 8:27 ` Jens Wiklander
2021-06-14 19:06 ` Tyler Hicks
2021-06-14 19:15 ` Jens Wiklander [this message]
2021-06-10 21:09 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] tee: add tee_shm_alloc_kernel_buf() Tyler Hicks
2021-06-10 21:09 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] tee: Support kernel shm registration without dma-buf backing Tyler Hicks
2021-06-11 5:16 ` Sumit Garg
2021-06-11 13:09 ` Tyler Hicks
2021-06-11 13:16 ` Tyler Hicks
2021-06-12 8:19 ` Sumit Garg
2021-06-13 8:16 ` Tyler Hicks
2021-06-14 4:59 ` Sumit Garg
2021-06-10 21:09 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] tpm_ftpm_tee: Free and unregister TEE shared memory during kexec Tyler Hicks
2021-06-15 13:04 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2021-06-10 21:09 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] firmware: tee_bnxt: Release TEE shm, session, and context " Tyler Hicks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210614191506.GA1373417@jade \
--to=jens.wiklander@linaro.org \
--cc=apais@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
--cc=thiruan@microsoft.com \
--cc=tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=vikas.gupta@broadcom.com \
--cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).