From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A2CC433FE for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 09:26:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F81610EA for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 09:26:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230081AbhJNJ2g (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Oct 2021 05:28:36 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:20564 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230026AbhJNJ2f (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Oct 2021 05:28:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1634203590; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=MFy26Kc6cpLu18LAs5Mx0Nrg8iL3DuTgZC2Ev14vjlo=; b=X2mCdv8b1K88eBKlnWLq69ctpJUgvxcadvamxM/mn99+T+jMO3aioYuoqC+npqMg6NSXb9 DjbnOYauRoO0F+uJ1Fd4TTsFKj80Qh9YoDcsBGmIU0Z53054RrYn3NRQVR6ZKRRpPpdlZw t/YBQ7/WS+kpUFDtv2YGdeKj9M2YW4E= Received: from mail-ed1-f72.google.com (mail-ed1-f72.google.com [209.85.208.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-490-mxiI0tPaPr2_Xf3gdutgqA-1; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 05:26:29 -0400 X-MC-Unique: mxiI0tPaPr2_Xf3gdutgqA-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f72.google.com with SMTP id d3-20020a056402516300b003db863a248eso4629719ede.16 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 02:26:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=MFy26Kc6cpLu18LAs5Mx0Nrg8iL3DuTgZC2Ev14vjlo=; b=ocPIiXbOUw8h2kGHu0D4Rr2gLYe+fwWMa7Av2HL5meHegJo1reb4rDb/95t+YW6lC+ fDcpYhN6n7pOZAxec9vgufaNlsPLpoSwt5HVm+RBdnrtwprKQQeYWMIOzE5Esv8/qzM0 D+2t6P6yhxnyq/gWk0bonXiaQPZNhFjlKOBLAzT9V5uC9G4Ng4bYZFxCdg/qYvKR7tB+ D2FEI4elIUHdxhTvt/FvBipkNXmFyow+DYINd7mxb2it3GU01MwD/DdzVLtvjKJZPEOF hwo2h4J47yEO8VGnm5vUgXBx93Nu4O3viLCQx1ZKxL4aQp318Ujem/wf6hQk57c2D4G9 gQCw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Yn1+ZGYumTAnAs8OMnncmqjExRAK08KBDl9YL86dNJjslZ+wV LgVjRSzo318mVao25xTyzIUY+GKUfngFOXqexTNb64NOs6nR1XDex9H9Ab/bVbXtG0JK9wVaXX1 9QwmqaSKLxbHQRyIqIUCNUQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3488:: with SMTP id v8mr6898735edc.106.1634203588051; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 02:26:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwzUMhY55dY1Ed2tUolHVxn0GGtah89ijl+mJABjkbp/N7HKf5Fl2EAkvFydJiTJ/Wm+2qndQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3488:: with SMTP id v8mr6898699edc.106.1634203587836; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 02:26:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com ([2.55.16.227]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f19sm1749252edj.77.2021.10.14.02.26.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 14 Oct 2021 02:26:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 05:26:20 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: "Reshetova, Elena" Cc: Andi Kleen , "Williams, Dan J" , Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Peter Zijlstra , "Lutomirski, Andy" , Bjorn Helgaas , Richard Henderson , Thomas Bogendoerfer , James E J Bottomley , Helge Deller , "David S . Miller" , Arnd Bergmann , Jonathan Corbet , Paolo Bonzini , David Hildenbrand , Andrea Arcangeli , Josh Poimboeuf , Peter H Anvin , "Hansen, Dave" , "Luck, Tony" , Kirill Shutemov , Sean Christopherson , Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan , X86 ML , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux PCI , "linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mips@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org" , "sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" , linux-arch , Linux Doc Mailing List , "virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/16] PCI: Add pci_iomap_host_shared(), pci_iomap_host_shared_range() Message-ID: <20211014052605-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20211009003711.1390019-1-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> <20211009003711.1390019-13-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> <20211009053103-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <0e6664ac-cbb2-96ff-0106-9301735c0836@linux.intel.com> <20211012171016-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20211014025514-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 07:27:42AM +0000, Reshetova, Elena wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 06:32:32AM +0000, Reshetova, Elena wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 06:36:16PM +0000, Reshetova, Elena wrote: > > > > > > The 5.15 tree has something like ~2.4k IO accesses (including MMIO and > > > > > > others) in init functions that also register drivers (thanks Elena for > > > > > > the number) > > > > > > > > > > To provide more numbers on this. What I can see so far from a smatch-based > > > > > analysis, we have 409 __init style functions (.probe & builtin/module_ > > > > > _platform_driver_probe excluded) for 5.15 with allyesconfig. > > > > > > > > I don't think we care about allyesconfig at all though. > > > > Just don't do that. > > > > How about allmodconfig? This is closer to what distros actually do. > > > > > > It does not make any difference really for the content of the /drivers/*: > > > gives 408 __init style functions doing IO (.probe & builtin/module_ > > > > > _platform_driver_probe excluded) for 5.15 with allmodconfig: > > > > > > ['doc200x_ident_chip', > > > 'doc_probe', 'doc2001_init', 'mtd_speedtest_init', > > > 'mtd_nandbiterrs_init', 'mtd_oobtest_init', 'mtd_pagetest_init', > > > 'tort_init', 'mtd_subpagetest_init', 'fixup_pmc551', > > > 'doc_set_driver_info', 'init_amd76xrom', 'init_l440gx', > > > 'init_sc520cdp', 'init_ichxrom', 'init_ck804xrom', 'init_esb2rom', > > > 'probe_acpi_namespace_devices', 'amd_iommu_init_pci', 'state_next', > > > 'arm_v7s_do_selftests', 'arm_lpae_run_tests', 'init_iommu_one', > > > > Um. ARM? Which architecture is this build for? > > The list of smatch IO findings is built for x86, but the smatch cross function > database covers all archs, so when queried for all potential function callers, > it would show non x86 arch call chains also. > > Here is the original x86 finding and call chain for the 'arm_v7s_do_selftests': > > Detected low-level IO from arm_v7s_do_selftests in fun > __iommu_queue_command_sync > > drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c:1025 __iommu_queue_command_sync() error: > {15002074744551330002} > 'check_host_input' read from the host using function 'readl' to a > member of the structure 'iommu->cmd_buf_head'; > > __iommu_queue_command_sync() > iommu_completion_wait() > amd_iommu_domain_flush_complete() > iommu_v1_map_page() > arm_v7s_do_selftests() > > So, the results can be further filtered if you want a specified arch. So what is it just for x86? Could you tell? -- MST