From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-mips-owner@vger.kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35465EB64DD
	for <linux-mips@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 11:37:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1343909AbjFOLhl (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-mips@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 15 Jun 2023 07:37:41 -0400
Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52858 "EHLO
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1343928AbjFOLhh (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 15 Jun 2023 07:37:37 -0400
Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1])
        by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E552297E;
        Thu, 15 Jun 2023 04:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140])
        (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
         key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A01DE63948;
        Thu, 15 Jun 2023 11:37:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B1DBC433C9;
        Thu, 15 Jun 2023 11:37:19 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org;
        s=korg; t=1686829040;
        bh=wFknVUKg9Zep7d8KD5madwbt58kjiSFqs26HYAb1rbk=;
        h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
        b=s8wZ7QwQnAwBaJb/shpXNC8ztWfk7NIxmFM56AXHYktUqDHJdmxhysd0ZA6Wt3CDs
         6KUhUniUBuODAE6OKAoMyDcOD9iAF2Kui7EC/JOGlsQpw3u5YUZWprfz1O/t2vIW31
         7R0yRjpm0hfZFE21TJYs4by/L1wilgzZpHTeLskM=
Date:   Thu, 15 Jun 2023 13:37:17 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc:     Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>,
        Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
        Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
        Andreas Klinger <ak@it-klinger.de>,
        Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Jonathan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Neusch=E4fer?= <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>,
        Akhil R <akhilrajeev@nvidia.com>, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] fix fwnode_irq_get[_byname()] returnvalue
Message-ID: <2023061553-urging-collision-32f8@gregkh>
References: <cover.1685340157.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
 <20230530233438.572db3fb@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230530233438.572db3fb@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-mips.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 11:34:38PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 29 May 2023 09:22:15 +0300 Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> > The fwnode_irq_get() and the fwnode_irq_get_byname() may have returned
> > zero if mapping the IRQ fails. This contradicts the
> > fwnode_irq_get_byname() documentation. Furthermore, returning zero or
> > errno on error is unepected and can easily lead to problems
> > like.
> 
> What's the merging plan? Could patch 1 go to a stable branch 
> and then driver trees can pull it in and apply their respective 
> patches locally?

I'll take patch 1 now, and then after 6.5-rc1, Matti, can you send the
cleanup patches to the respective subsystems?

thanks,

greg k-h