From: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>,
Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 09/11] KVM: arm64: Flush only the memslot after write-protect
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2023 00:54:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230715005405.3689586-10-rananta@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230715005405.3689586-1-rananta@google.com>
After write-protecting the region, currently KVM invalidates
the entire TLB entries using kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(). Instead,
scope the invalidation only to the targeted memslot. If
supported, the architecture would use the range-based TLBI
instructions to flush the memslot or else fallback to flushing
all of the TLBs.
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
index 387f2215fde7..985f605e2abc 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -1082,7 +1082,7 @@ static void kvm_mmu_wp_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, int slot)
write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
stage2_wp_range(&kvm->arch.mmu, start, end);
write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
- kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
+ kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, memslot);
}
/**
--
2.41.0.455.g037347b96a-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-15 0:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-15 0:53 [PATCH v6 00/11] KVM: arm64: Add support for FEAT_TLBIRANGE Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-15 0:53 ` [PATCH v6 01/11] KVM: Rename kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlb() to kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-17 8:03 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-07-17 11:06 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-07-15 0:53 ` [PATCH v6 02/11] KVM: arm64: Use kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-17 8:12 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-07-17 16:28 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-17 11:27 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-07-15 0:53 ` [PATCH v6 03/11] KVM: Allow range-based TLB invalidation from common code Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-17 11:40 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-07-17 16:37 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-18 2:49 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-07-18 16:31 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-15 0:53 ` [PATCH v6 04/11] KVM: Move kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot() to " Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-18 2:47 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-07-15 0:53 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] arm64: tlb: Refactor the core flush algorithm of __flush_tlb_range Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-18 6:21 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-07-15 0:54 ` [PATCH v6 06/11] KVM: arm64: Implement __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range() Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-18 7:50 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-07-18 16:39 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-15 0:54 ` [PATCH v6 07/11] KVM: arm64: Define kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range() Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-18 8:39 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-07-15 0:54 ` [PATCH v6 08/11] KVM: arm64: Implement kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_range() Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-18 11:15 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-07-15 0:54 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta [this message]
2023-07-18 11:17 ` [PATCH v6 09/11] KVM: arm64: Flush only the memslot after write-protect Shaoqin Huang
2023-07-15 0:54 ` [PATCH v6 10/11] KVM: arm64: Invalidate the table entries upon a range Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-18 11:17 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-07-15 0:54 ` [PATCH v6 11/11] KVM: arm64: Use TLBI range-based intructions for unmap Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-15 2:02 ` [PATCH v6 00/11] KVM: arm64: Add support for FEAT_TLBIRANGE Raghavendra Rao Ananta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230715005405.3689586-10-rananta@google.com \
--to=rananta@google.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).