From: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>,
Raghavendra Rao Anata <rananta@google.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 04/11] KVM: Move kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot() to common code
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2023 00:53:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230715005405.3689586-5-rananta@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230715005405.3689586-1-rananta@google.com>
From: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Move kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot() to common code and drop
"arch_" from the name. kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot() is just a
range-based TLB invalidation where the range is defined by the memslot.
Now that kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_range() can be called from common code we
can just use that and drop a bunch of duplicate code from the arch
directories.
Note this adds a lockdep assertion for slots_lock being held when
calling kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(), which was previously only
asserted on x86. MIPS has calls to kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(),
but they all hold the slots_lock, so the lockdep assertion continues to
hold true.
Also drop the CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT ifdef gating
kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(), since it is no longer necessary.
Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 6 ------
arch/mips/kvm/mips.c | 10 ++--------
arch/riscv/kvm/mmu.c | 6 ------
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 16 +---------------
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 2 +-
include/linux/kvm_host.h | 7 +++----
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
7 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index c2c14059f6a8..ed7bef4d970b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -1525,12 +1525,6 @@ void kvm_arch_sync_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot)
}
-void kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
- const struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot)
-{
- kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
-}
-
static int kvm_vm_ioctl_set_device_addr(struct kvm *kvm,
struct kvm_arm_device_addr *dev_addr)
{
diff --git a/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c b/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c
index 4b7bc39a4173..231ac052b506 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ void kvm_arch_flush_shadow_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
/* Flush slot from GPA */
kvm_mips_flush_gpa_pt(kvm, slot->base_gfn,
slot->base_gfn + slot->npages - 1);
- kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, slot);
+ kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, slot);
spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
}
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ void kvm_arch_commit_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
needs_flush = kvm_mips_mkclean_gpa_pt(kvm, new->base_gfn,
new->base_gfn + new->npages - 1);
if (needs_flush)
- kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, new);
+ kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, new);
spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
}
}
@@ -987,12 +987,6 @@ int kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm)
return 1;
}
-void kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
- const struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot)
-{
- kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
-}
-
int kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg)
{
int r;
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/mmu.c
index f2eb47925806..97e129620686 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -406,12 +406,6 @@ void kvm_arch_sync_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot)
{
}
-void kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
- const struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot)
-{
- kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
-}
-
void kvm_arch_free_memslot(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *free)
{
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index aaa5e336703a..b320a4254a2b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -6669,7 +6669,7 @@ static void kvm_rmap_zap_collapsible_sptes(struct kvm *kvm,
*/
if (walk_slot_rmaps(kvm, slot, kvm_mmu_zap_collapsible_spte,
PG_LEVEL_4K, KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL - 1, true))
- kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, slot);
+ kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, slot);
}
void kvm_mmu_zap_collapsible_sptes(struct kvm *kvm,
@@ -6688,20 +6688,6 @@ void kvm_mmu_zap_collapsible_sptes(struct kvm *kvm,
}
}
-void kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
- const struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot)
-{
- /*
- * All current use cases for flushing the TLBs for a specific memslot
- * related to dirty logging, and many do the TLB flush out of mmu_lock.
- * The interaction between the various operations on memslot must be
- * serialized by slots_locks to ensure the TLB flush from one operation
- * is observed by any other operation on the same memslot.
- */
- lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->slots_lock);
- kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_range(kvm, memslot->base_gfn, memslot->npages);
-}
-
void kvm_mmu_slot_leaf_clear_dirty(struct kvm *kvm,
const struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot)
{
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index a6b9bea62fb8..faeb2e307b36 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -12751,7 +12751,7 @@ static void kvm_mmu_slot_apply_flags(struct kvm *kvm,
* See is_writable_pte() for more details (the case involving
* access-tracked SPTEs is particularly relevant).
*/
- kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, new);
+ kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, new);
}
}
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index a731967b24ff..45899ce9ed31 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -1360,6 +1360,8 @@ void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool yield_to_kernel_mode);
void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm);
void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn, u64 pages);
+void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
+ const struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot);
#ifdef KVM_ARCH_NR_OBJS_PER_MEMORY_CACHE
int kvm_mmu_topup_memory_cache(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc, int min);
@@ -1388,10 +1390,7 @@ void kvm_arch_mmu_enable_log_dirty_pt_masked(struct kvm *kvm,
unsigned long mask);
void kvm_arch_sync_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot);
-#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT
-void kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
- const struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot);
-#else /* !CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT */
+#ifndef CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT
int kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_dirty_log *log);
int kvm_get_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_dirty_log *log,
int *is_dirty, struct kvm_memory_slot **memslot);
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 804470fccac7..58213cc4b9b9 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -379,6 +379,20 @@ void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn, u64 pages)
kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
}
+void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
+ const struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot)
+{
+ /*
+ * All current use cases for flushing the TLBs for a specific memslot
+ * related to dirty logging, and many do the TLB flush out of mmu_lock.
+ * The interaction between the various operations on memslot must be
+ * serialized by slots_locks to ensure the TLB flush from one operation
+ * is observed by any other operation on the same memslot.
+ */
+ lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->slots_lock);
+ kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_range(kvm, memslot->base_gfn, memslot->npages);
+}
+
static void kvm_flush_shadow_all(struct kvm *kvm)
{
kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all(kvm);
@@ -2191,7 +2205,7 @@ static int kvm_get_dirty_log_protect(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_dirty_log *log)
}
if (flush)
- kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, memslot);
+ kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, memslot);
if (copy_to_user(log->dirty_bitmap, dirty_bitmap_buffer, n))
return -EFAULT;
@@ -2308,7 +2322,7 @@ static int kvm_clear_dirty_log_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
KVM_MMU_UNLOCK(kvm);
if (flush)
- kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, memslot);
+ kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, memslot);
return 0;
}
--
2.41.0.455.g037347b96a-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-15 0:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-15 0:53 [PATCH v6 00/11] KVM: arm64: Add support for FEAT_TLBIRANGE Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-15 0:53 ` [PATCH v6 01/11] KVM: Rename kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlb() to kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-17 8:03 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-07-17 11:06 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-07-15 0:53 ` [PATCH v6 02/11] KVM: arm64: Use kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-17 8:12 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-07-17 16:28 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-17 11:27 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-07-15 0:53 ` [PATCH v6 03/11] KVM: Allow range-based TLB invalidation from common code Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-17 11:40 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-07-17 16:37 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-18 2:49 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-07-18 16:31 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-15 0:53 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta [this message]
2023-07-18 2:47 ` [PATCH v6 04/11] KVM: Move kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot() to " Shaoqin Huang
2023-07-15 0:53 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] arm64: tlb: Refactor the core flush algorithm of __flush_tlb_range Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-18 6:21 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-07-15 0:54 ` [PATCH v6 06/11] KVM: arm64: Implement __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range() Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-18 7:50 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-07-18 16:39 ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-15 0:54 ` [PATCH v6 07/11] KVM: arm64: Define kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range() Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-18 8:39 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-07-15 0:54 ` [PATCH v6 08/11] KVM: arm64: Implement kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_range() Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-18 11:15 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-07-15 0:54 ` [PATCH v6 09/11] KVM: arm64: Flush only the memslot after write-protect Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-18 11:17 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-07-15 0:54 ` [PATCH v6 10/11] KVM: arm64: Invalidate the table entries upon a range Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-18 11:17 ` Shaoqin Huang
2023-07-15 0:54 ` [PATCH v6 11/11] KVM: arm64: Use TLBI range-based intructions for unmap Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2023-07-15 2:02 ` [PATCH v6 00/11] KVM: arm64: Add support for FEAT_TLBIRANGE Raghavendra Rao Ananta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230715005405.3689586-5-rananta@google.com \
--to=rananta@google.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).