From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: "Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Alexandre Ghiti" <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Dinh Nguyen" <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
"Donald Dutile" <ddutile@redhat.com>,
"Eric Chanudet" <echanude@redhat.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Helge Deller" <deller@gmx.de>,
"Huacai Chen" <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
"Kent Overstreet" <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>,
"Luis Chamberlain" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Nadav Amit" <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Puranjay Mohan" <puranjay12@gmail.com>,
"Rick Edgecombe" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-mips@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-modules@vger.kernel.org" <linux-modules@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"loongarch@lists.linux.dev" <loongarch@lists.linux.dev>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/15] kprobes: remove dependency on CONFIG_MODULES
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 18:15:00 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240420181500.07b39c77f1ca086e8a5161b4@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZiNv0jY7Ebw75iQl@kernel.org>
On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 10:33:38 +0300
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 03:59:40PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >
> >
> > Le 19/04/2024 à 17:49, Mike Rapoport a écrit :
> > > Hi Masami,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 06:16:15AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > >> Hi Mike,
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:00:50 +0300
> > >> Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@kernel.org>
> > >>>
> > >>> kprobes depended on CONFIG_MODULES because it has to allocate memory for
> > >>> code.
> > >>>
> > >>> Since code allocations are now implemented with execmem, kprobes can be
> > >>> enabled in non-modular kernels.
> > >>>
> > >>> Add #ifdef CONFIG_MODULE guards for the code dealing with kprobes inside
> > >>> modules, make CONFIG_KPROBES select CONFIG_EXECMEM and drop the
> > >>> dependency of CONFIG_KPROBES on CONFIG_MODULES.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for this work, but this conflicts with the latest fix in v6.9-rc4.
> > >> Also, can you use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES) instead of #ifdefs in
> > >> function body? We have enough dummy functions for that, so it should
> > >> not make a problem.
> > >
> > > The code in check_kprobe_address_safe() that gets the module and checks for
> > > __init functions does not compile with IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES).
> > > I can pull it out to a helper or leave #ifdef in the function body,
> > > whichever you prefer.
> >
> > As far as I can see, the only problem is MODULE_STATE_COMING.
> > Can we move 'enum module_state' out of #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES in module.h ?
>
> There's dereference of 'struct module' there:
>
> (*probed_mod)->state != MODULE_STATE_COMING) {
> ...
> }
>
> so moving out 'enum module_state' won't be enough.
Hmm, this part should be inline functions like;
#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
static inline bool module_is_coming(struct module *mod)
{
return mod->state == MODULE_STATE_COMING;
}
#else
#define module_is_coming(mod) (false)
#endif
Then we don't need the enum.
Thank you,
>
> > >
> > >> --
> > >> Masami Hiramatsu
> > >
>
> --
> Sincerely yours,
> Mike.
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-20 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-11 16:00 [PATCH v4 00/15] mm: jit/text allocator Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 01/15] arm64: module: remove uneeded call to kasan_alloc_module_shadow() Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 02/15] mips: module: rename MODULE_START to MODULES_VADDR Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 03/15] nios2: define virtual address space for modules Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 04/15] module: make module_memory_{alloc,free} more self-contained Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 05/15] mm: introduce execmem_alloc() and execmem_free() Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 19:42 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-04-14 6:53 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-12 9:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2024-04-14 6:54 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-15 7:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-15 16:51 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-15 17:36 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-16 7:22 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-17 23:32 ` Song Liu
2024-04-18 15:35 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-18 16:13 ` Song Liu
2024-04-18 17:52 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-18 21:01 ` Song Liu
2024-04-19 6:55 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 15:54 ` Song Liu
2024-04-19 17:02 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 17:32 ` Song Liu
2024-04-19 19:59 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 21:42 ` Song Liu
2024-04-20 4:22 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-20 9:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-22 18:32 ` Song Liu
2024-04-17 21:06 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 06/15] mm/execmem, arch: convert simple overrides of module_alloc to execmem Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 20:53 ` Sam Ravnborg
2024-04-14 7:26 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-15 8:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 07/15] mm/execmem, arch: convert remaining " Mike Rapoport
2024-04-15 9:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 08/15] arm64: extend execmem_info for generated code allocations Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 09/15] riscv: extend execmem_params " Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 10/15] powerpc: extend execmem_params for kprobes allocations Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 11/15] arch: make execmem setup available regardless of CONFIG_MODULES Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 12/15] x86/ftrace: enable dynamic ftrace without CONFIG_MODULES Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 13/15] powerpc: use CONFIG_EXECMEM instead of CONFIG_MODULES where appropiate Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 14/15] kprobes: remove dependency on CONFIG_MODULES Mike Rapoport
2024-04-17 21:16 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-04-18 15:37 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 15:49 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-19 15:59 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-04-20 7:33 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-20 9:15 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2024-04-20 10:52 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 15/15] bpf: remove CONFIG_BPF_JIT dependency on CONFIG_MODULES of Mike Rapoport
2024-04-11 18:00 ` [PATCH v4 00/15] mm: jit/text allocator Kent Overstreet
2024-04-11 19:45 ` Luis Chamberlain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240420181500.07b39c77f1ca086e8a5161b4@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=dinguyen@kernel.org \
--cc=echanude@redhat.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=puranjay12@gmail.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).